Is it better to see Europe by plane or train?
Should you hop between destinations or take in the scenery from ground level? In Europe, the choice is yours. So is it better to fly between European cities or travel by rail?
The first thing to think about is how much time you have. Train travel is undeniably more scenic, but it’s also a lot slower. For example, a fairly standard European itinerary of London to Paris to Rome and back to London would take around 28 hours by train. Total flight time for the same route would only be around six hours and even when you add in the fact that you have to arrive early at the airport and any potential delays, the flights are still streets ahead. However, if you’re only travelling short distances (say from Rome to Florence to Venice) then the train is going to be far quicker and easier.
Then you need to look at the quality. Most of the budget airlines flying around Europe (like Ryanair and EasyJet) aren’t very good. The planes tend to be old, the seats are tiny and they charge extra for everything from checked baggage to a bottle of water. By and large, train travel is more comfortable and the carriages of a higher quality. Add to that the quality of the view from the huge window. Trains like the Glacier Express through Switzerland or the TGV winding through the French countryside from Paris to Nice are spectacularly lovely. And you can’t see that from a plane.
Next, there’s convenience. Most of Europe’s budget airlines fly from outlying airports rather than the main hub. It might even by in an adjoining town, requiring a lengthy bus or train ride into the city. Major inter-European train routes pull into stations right in the centre of town. There are few more spectacular arrivals in the world than stepping out of the Santa Lucia train station in the centre of Venice, just metres away from the Grand Canal.
And finally, perhaps the most important consideration of all: price. Budget airlines are hard to beat, often offering flights between major cities for as little as $20 one way. But be careful – you’ll rarely get away with paying the base price. By the time you add on seat selection, luggage, entertainment or food you’re quickly looking at double or triple the original fare. Alternatively, a train fare from Rome to Venice or Milan can cost as little as $50 and includes luggage and free Wi-Fi.
The answer? It depends. We suggest doing some of the longer legs by plane to save time, but don’t miss the chance to see Europe’s picture book countryside from the window of a train.
What method of travel do you opt for when you’re visiting Europe? And what’s your reason for doing so?
Let us know in the comments.
Related links:
5 stunning European islands you haven’t heard of
10 gorgeous photos from seaside towns in Italy
Santorini planning to ration cruise tourists