Placeholder Content Image

Tiny discovery could explain why our brains beat Neanderthal brains

<p dir="ltr">Our brains are incredibly complex, even in comparison to some of our closest animal relatives - and now we’re one step closer to knowing why.</p> <p dir="ltr">Human brains are made up of a whopping 86 billion neurons on average, which is up to three times more than primates.</p> <p dir="ltr">In a breakthrough study, scientists found that one change in our genes helps our brains develop more neurons than other animals, as well as our extinct cousins, the Neanderthals.</p> <p dir="ltr">Although our brains are roughly the same size as those belonging to Neanderthals, ours are differently shaped and allowed us to create technologies that our cousins never did.</p> <p dir="ltr">A team of scientists at the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics went looking for differences between our and Neanderthal brains and focused on the neocortex, a region of the brain behind our foreheads that is the largest and most recently developed part of our brain.</p> <p dir="ltr">While focusing on a particular gene, called <em>TKTL1</em>, the team found that the chain amino acids that make up the gene in modern humans has just one difference from the same gene in Neanderthals and other mammals.</p> <p dir="ltr">After looking at previously published data, they found that <em>TKTL1 </em>was mostly expressed in progenitor cells - a type of cell that can become more specialised cells - called basal radial glia, which are responsible for producing neurons during development.</p> <p dir="ltr">To test their findings, the researchers introduced the gene into two groups of mice, which don’t express either version of the gene. One group received the modern version of the gene which humans have, while the other received the archaic version.</p> <p dir="ltr">The mice with the modern form of the gene went on to produce more basal radial glia, which then resulted in more cortical neurons developing, in comparison to those with the older version of the gene.</p> <p dir="ltr">Repeating the experiment in ferrets, which also carry the older version of the gene and have folds in their brains, they found that animals with the modern gene produced more neurons and had larger brain folds.</p> <p dir="ltr">Finally, they went to verify their findings in human foetal neocortex cells - this time by removing the <em>TKTL1 </em>gene. Cells without the modern gene produced fewer of the progenitor cells.</p> <p dir="ltr">Although they stress that additional genes may be behind why we have more neurons than our relatives, Wieland Huttner, one of the researchers involved, said the study “makes the point that this one gene is an essential player” for shaping our big brains.</p> <p dir="ltr">Christoph Zollikofer, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Zurich who wasn’t involved in the study, said the study presents a “smoking gun” showing how our brains are different from those of Neanderthals.</p> <p dir="ltr">The study was published in the journal <em><a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abl6422" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Science</a></em>.</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-0b806d03-7fff-5ff5-12ff-39d6b4aa5fd5"></span></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p>

Mind

Placeholder Content Image

Neanderthals died out 40,000 years ago, but there has never been more of their DNA on Earth

<p>Neanderthals have served as a reflection of our own humanity since they were first discovered in <a href="https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/who-were-the-neanderthals.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">1856</a>. What we think we know about them has been shaped and moulded to fit our cultural trends, social norms and scientific standards. They have changed from diseased specimens to primitive sub-human lumbering cousins to <a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/rethinking-neanderthals-83341003/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">advanced humans</a>.</p> <p>We now know Homo neanderthalensis were very similar to ourselves and we even met them and frequently interbred. But why did they go extinct, while we <a href="https://global.oup.com/ukhe/product/the-cradle-of-humanity-9780198704539?cc=gb&amp;lang=en&amp;" target="_blank" rel="noopener">survived, flourished and ended up taking over the planet</a>?</p> <p>Neanderthals evolved over 400,000 years ago, most likely from an earlier ancestor <a href="https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species/homo-heidelbergensis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Homo heidelbergensis</a>. They were extremely successful and spread across an area from the Mediterranean to Siberia. They were highly intelligent, with brains on average <a href="https://www.livescience.com/60481-how-neanderthals-got-such-large-brains.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">bigger than Homo sapiens‘s</a>.</p> <p>They hunted for <a href="https://theconversation.com/why-the-neanderthals-may-have-been-more-sophisticated-hunters-than-we-thought-new-study-98870" target="_blank" rel="noopener">big game</a>, collected plants, fungi, and seafood, controlled fire to cook, <a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1907828116" target="_blank" rel="noopener">made composite tools</a>, made <a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1112261109" target="_blank" rel="noopener">clothes from animal skins</a>, made beads from shells, and were able to <a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1411529111" target="_blank" rel="noopener">carve symbols on to cave walls</a>. They took care of their young, old and weak, created shelters for protection, lived through harsh winters and warm summers, and they buried their dead.</p> <p>Neanderthals did meet our ancestors on several occasions over the course of tens of thousands of years and the two species shared the European continent for at least 14,000 years. They even <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03335-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">mated with each other</a>.</p> <h2>Death of a species</h2> <p>The most significant difference between Neanderthals and ourselves is that they went extinct about 40,000 years ago. The precise cause of their demise still eludes us, but we think it was probably the result of a combination of factors.</p> <p>First the climate of the last ice age was very variable, shifting from <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04600-9" target="_blank" rel="noopener">cold to warm and back again</a>, which put pressure on animal and plant food sources and meant Neanderthals constantly had to <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jbi.12845" target="_blank" rel="noopener">adapt to environmental change</a>. Second there were never that many Neanderthals, with the overall population never exceeding the tens of thousands.</p> <p>They lived in groups of five to 15 individuals, compared with Homo Sapiens that had groups of up to <a href="https://theconversation.com/our-large-brains-evolved-thanks-to-an-ancient-arms-race-for-resources-and-mates-79183" target="_blank" rel="noopener">150 individuals</a>. These small isolated Neanderthal populations may have been increasingly genetically unsustainable.</p> <p>Third there was competition with other predators, particularly the <a href="https://theconversation.com/war-in-the-time-of-neanderthals-how-our-species-battled-for-supremacy-for-over-100-000-years-148205" target="_blank" rel="noopener">groups of modern humans</a> that emerged from Africa about 60,000 years ago. We speculate that many Neanderthals may have been assimilated into the larger bands of Homo sapiens.</p> <h2>Where’s the evidence?</h2> <p>Neanderthals left numerous traces for us to examine tens of thousands of years later, much of which can be seen at the special exhibition we have helped curate at the <a href="https://snm.ku.dk/english/exhibitions/neanderthal/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Natural History Museum of Denmark</a>. Over the past 150 years we have collected fossil bones, stone and wooden tools, found trinkets and jewellery they left behind, uncovered burials, and now mapped their genome from ancient DNA. It seems that <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03335-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">99.7% of Neanderthal</a> and modern human DNA is identical and they are our closest extinct relatives.</p> <p>Perhaps the most surprising fact was evidence of <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03335-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">interbreeding</a> that has left traces of DNA in living humans today. Many Europeans and Asians have between 1% and 4% Neanderthal DNA while African people south of the Sahara have almost zero. Ironically, with a current world population of about 8 billion people, this means that there has never been more Neanderthal DNA on Earth.</p> <p>The Neanderthal genome also helps us understand more of what they looked like, as there is evidence that some Neanderthals evolved pale skin and red hair long before Homo sapiens. The many genes that are shared between Neanderthals and modern humans are linked to anything from the ability to taste bitter foods to the capacity to speak.</p> <p>We have also increased our knowledge of human health. For instance, some Neanderthal DNA that might have been beneficial to humans tens of thousands of years ago now seems to cause issues when combined with a modern western lifestyle.</p> <p>There are links to alcoholism, obesity, allergies, blood clotting, and <a href="https://institutions.newscientist.com/article/2077269-our-neanderthal-genes-linked-to-risk-of-depression-and-addiction" target="_blank" rel="noopener">depression</a>. Recently, scientists suggested an ancient gene variant from Neanderthals might increase the risk of <a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2026309118" target="_blank" rel="noopener">serious complications from contracting COVID-19</a>.</p> <h2>Holding up a mirror</h2> <p>Like the dinosaurs, the Neanderthals didn’t know what was coming. The difference is that the dinosaurs disappeared suddenly following a giant meteorite hit from outer space. To the Neanderthals extinction happened gradually. They eventually lost their world, a comfortable home they had successfully occupied for hundreds of thousands of years that slowly turned against them, until existence itself was unsustainable.</p> <p>In that sense, Neanderthals now serve a different purpose. We see our reflection in them. They didn’t know what was happening to them and they had no choice but to continue down the road that eventually led to extinction. We on the other hand are painfully aware of our situation and the impact we have on this planet.</p> <p>Human activity is <a href="https://theconversation.com/climate-change-how-bad-could-the-future-be-if-we-do-nothing-159665" target="_blank" rel="noopener">changing the climate</a> and is leading straight into a sixth mass extinction. We can reflect on the mess we have landed ourselves in and we can do something about it.</p> <p>If we don’t want to end up like the Neanderthals, we better get our act together and collectively work for a more sustainable future. Neanderthal extinction reminds us that we should never take our existence for granted.</p> <p><strong>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://theconversation.com/neanderthals-died-out-40-000-years-ago-but-there-has-never-been-more-of-their-dna-on-earth-189021" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Conversation</a>.</strong></p> <p><em>Image: Shutterstock</em></p>

Body

Placeholder Content Image

Thank Neanderthals’ diet for your big brain

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span><a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/118/20/e2021655118"><span style="font-weight: 400;">A new study</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> could dramatically alter our perception of Neanderthals as brutish meat eaters.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The study examined bacteria collected from Neanderthal teeth and found that our ancient cousins ate so many roots, nuts, or other starchy foods that they radically changed the types of bacteria in their mouths.</span></p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/COtBLAINKos/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="13"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/COtBLAINKos/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">A post shared by MPI-Science of Human History (@mpi_shh)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Although this might not come across as significant, the findings suggest our ancestors started eating lots of starch at least 600,000 years ago - right around the time that they needed more sugars to expand their brains.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The work suggests that ancestors of both humans and Neanderthals were cooking starchy foods at least 600,000 years ago, and that they had already adapted to eating starchy plants long before the invention of agriculture 10,000 years ago, according to Harvard University evolutionary biologist Rachel Carmody.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Our ancestors’ brains doubled in size between 2 million and 700,000 years ago.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Though researchers have long attributed brain growth to the use of stone tools and cooperative hunting style of early humans that let them eat more energy-rich meat, how this actually worked has long puzzled researchers.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“For human ancestors to efficiently grow a bigger brain, they needed energy dense foods containing glucose” - a type of sugar - molecular archaeologist Christina Warinner of Harvard and the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History said. “Meat is not a good source of glucose.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But, the starch-filled plants collected by hunter-gatherers do act as an excellent source of glucose. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">By studying the DNA of bacteria stuck to the teeth of Neanderthals, chimps, gorillas, howler monkeys, and preagricultural humans that lived more than 10,000 years ago, researchers found that the bacteria in preagricultural humans and Neanderthals strongly resembled each other.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In particular, they found an unusual group of </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Streptococcus</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> bacteria in their mouths, which has a special ability to free sugars from starchy foods by binding to an enzyme in human saliva called amylase.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The strep bacteria that consume sugar were found on Neanderthal and ancient modern human teeth, but not on chimps, which the researchers said shows they were eating more starchy foods.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">It also suggests they inherited these microbes from their common ancestor, who lived more than 600,000 years ago.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Although evidence of Neanderthals eating grasses, tubers, and cooked barley has already been found, this new study indicates that they ate so much starch that it altered the composition of the microbiomes in their mouths.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“This pushes the importance of starch in the diet further back in time” to when human brains were still growing, Warinner said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Because the amylase enzyme is more efficient at digesting cooked starch rather than raw starch, the research also suggests that cooking was common by 600,000 years ago, Carmody said. </span></p>

Mind

Placeholder Content Image

Stone tools reveal epic trek of nomadic Neanderthals

<p>Neanderthal (<em>Homo neanderthalensis</em>) fossils were first discovered in western Europe in the mid nineteenth century. That was just the first in a long line of surprises thrown up by our closest evolutionary cousins.</p> <p>We reveal another in <a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/01/21/1918047117">our new study</a> of the Neanderthals who lived in Chagyrskaya Cave in southern Siberia around 54,000 years ago. Their distinctive stone tools are dead ringers for those found thousands of kilometres away in eastern and central Europe.</p> <p>The intercontinental journey made by these intrepid Neanderthals is equivalent to walking from Sydney to Perth, or from New York to Los Angeles, and is a rare example of long-distance migration by Palaeolithic people.</p> <p><strong>Knuckleheads no more</strong></p> <p>For a long time Neanderthals were seen as intellectual lightweights. However, <a href="https://theconversation.com/neanderthals-were-no-brutes-research-reveals-they-may-have-been-precision-workers-103858">several recent finds</a> have forced a rethink of their cognitive and creative abilities.</p> <p>Neanderthals are now believed to have created 176,000 year-old enigmatic structures made from broken stalactites in a <a href="https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2016/05/neanderthals-caves-rings-building-france-archaeology/">cave in France</a>, and <a href="https://theconversation.com/how-we-discovered-that-neanderthals-could-make-art-92127">cave art in Spain</a>that dates back more than 65,000 years.</p> <p>They also used <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045927">bird feathers</a> and <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar5255">pierced shells</a> bearing traces of red and yellow ochre, possibly as personal ornaments. It seems likely Neanderthals had cognitive capabilities and symbolic behaviours similar to those of modern humans (<em>Homo sapiens</em>).</p> <p>Our knowledge of their geographical range and the nature of their encounters with other groups of humans has also expanded greatly in recent years.</p> <p>We now know that Neanderthals ventured beyond Europe and western Asia, reaching at least as far east as the Altai Mountains. Here, they interbred with another group of archaic humans dubbed the <a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/scientists-recreate-face-denisovan-using-dna-180973177/">Denisovans</a>.</p> <p>Traces of Neanderthal interactions with our own ancestors also persist in the DNA of all living people of Eurasian descent. However, we can still only speculate why the Neanderthals vanished around 40,000 years ago.</p> <p><strong>Banished to Siberia</strong></p> <p>Other questions also remain unresolved. When did Neanderthals first arrive in the Altai? Were there later migration events? Where did these trailblazers begin their trek? And what routes did they take across Asia?</p> <p><a href="https://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/derevyanko345">Chagyrskaya Cave</a> is nestled in the foothills of the Altai Mountains. The cave deposits were first excavated in 2007 and have yielded almost 90,000 stone tools and numerous bone tools.</p> <p>The excavations have also found 74 Neanderthal fossils – the richest trove of any Altai site – and a range of animal and plant remains, including the abundant bones of bison hunted and butchered by the Neanderthals.</p> <p>We used <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/520438a">optical dating</a> to determine when the cave sediments, artefacts and fossils were deposited, and conducted a detailed study of more than 3,000 stone tools recovered from the deepest archaeological levels. Microscopy analysis revealed that these have remained intact and undisturbed since accumulating during a period of cold and dry climate about 54,000 years ago.</p> <p>Using a variety of statistical techniques, we show that these artefacts bear a striking similarity to so-called <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micoquien">Micoquian</a> artefacts from central and eastern Europe. This type of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Paleolithic">Middle Palaeolithic</a> assemblage is readily identified by the distinctive appearance of the bifaces – tools made by removing flakes from both sides – which were used to cut meat.</p> <p>Micoquian-like tools have only been found at one other site in the Altai. All other archaeological assemblages in the Altai and central Asia lack these distinctive artefacts.</p> <p>Neanderthals carrying Micoquian tools may never have reached <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00353-0">Denisova Cave</a>, as there is no fossil or sedimentary DNA evidence of Neanderthals there after 100,000 years ago.</p> <p><strong>Going the distance</strong></p> <p>The presence of Micoquian artefacts at Chagyrskaya Cave suggests at least two separate dispersals of Neanderthals into southern Siberia. Sites such as Denisova Cave were occupied by Neanderthals who entered the region before 100,000 years ago, while the Chagyrskaya Neanderthals arrived later.</p> <p>The Chagyrskaya artefacts most closely resemble those found at sites located 3,000–4,000 km to the west, between the Crimea and northern Caucasus in eastern Europe.</p> <p>Comparison of genetic data supports these geographical links, with the <a href="https://www.eva.mpg.de/genetics/genome-projects/chagyrskaya-neandertal/home.html">Chagyrskaya Neanderthal</a> sharing closer affinities with several European Neanderthals than with a Neanderthal from Denisova Cave.</p> <p>When the Chagyrskaya toolmakers (or their ancestors) left their Neanderthal homeland in eastern Europe for central Asia around 60,000 years ago, they could have headed north and east around the land-locked <a href="https://www.britannica.com/place/Caspian-Sea">Caspian Sea</a>, which was much reduced in size under the prevailing cold and arid conditions.</p> <p>Their intercontinental odyssey over thousands of kilometres is a rarely observed case of long-distance dispersal in the Palaeolithic, and highlights the value of stone tools as culturally informative markers of ancient population movements.</p> <p>Environmental reconstructions from the animal and plant remains at Chagyrskaya Cave suggest that the Neanderthal inhabitants survived in the cold, dry and treeless environment by hunting bison and horses on the steppe or tundra-steppe landscape.</p> <p>Our discoveries reinforce the emerging view of Neanderthals as creative and intelligent people who were skilled survivors. If this was the case, it makes their extinction across Eurasia even more mysterious. Did modern humans deal the fatal blow? The enigma endures, for now.</p> <p><em>Written by Kseniya Kolobova, Maciej T. Krajcarz and Richard 'Bert' Roberts. Republished with permission of <a href="https://theconversation.com/stone-tools-reveal-epic-trek-of-nomadic-neanderthals-129886">The Conversation.</a></em></p>

Travel Tips