Search

Placeholder Content Image

No link found between caesarean birth and food allergies

<p>While babies born through caesareans may lack some gut bacteria that would otherwise be gained through vaginal births, recent research has consistently shown that there is little evidence for caesarean births being responsible for asthma and allergies. A recent study by the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (MCRI) in Melbourne, confirmed no link between caesarean births and food allergies during the first year of life.</p> <p>This research, published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, looked at 2,045 infants who underwent skin prick testing and an oral food challenge to test for allergy status. In this group, of the 30% that were born by caesarean, 12.7 % had a food allergy, compared to 13.2% born vaginally, meaning there was no statistically significant difference between birthing methods.</p> <p>“We found no meaningful differences in food allergy for infants born by caesarean delivery compared to those born by vaginal delivery,” says Rachel Peters, who led the study. “Additionally, there was no difference in likelihood of food allergy if the caesarean was performed before or after the onset of labour, or whether it was an emergency or elective caesarean.”</p> <p>A potential link between caesarean births and allergies had long been suspected because of the difference in early microbial exposure compared to vaginal delivery.</p> <p>“The infant immune system undergoes rapid development during the neonatal period,” says Peters. “The mode of delivery may interfere with the normal development of the immune system. Babies born by caesarean have less exposure to the bacteria from the mother’s gut and vagina, which influences the composition of the baby’s microbiome and immune system development. However, this doesn’t appear to play a major role in the development of food allergy.”</p> <p>These findings will assist caregivers to better evaluate risks and benefits of caesarean birth, and provide reassurance to parents that such interventions do not lead to an increased risk of food allergy in their babies.</p> <p>One in 10 infants, and one in 20 children over the age of five years in Australia, have a food allergy, one of the highest rates in the world. This research provides further good news to parents and children: 30% of peanut allergies and 90% of egg allergies naturally resolved by six years of age. These infants should be targeted for early intervention trials, such as oral immunotherapy.</p> <p>“Prioritising research of these and future interventions for infants less likely to naturally outgrow their allergy would yield the most benefit for healthcare resources and research funding,” says Peters.</p> <p><em><strong>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/health/caesarean-no-food-allergy-link/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">cosmosmagazine.com</a> and was written by Qamariya Nasrullah.</strong></em></p> <p><em>Image: Shutterstock</em></p>

Caring

Placeholder Content Image

Vaginal birth after caesarean increases the risk of serious perineal tear by 20%, our large-scale review shows

<p>Pregnant women who previously birthed by caesarean section are presented with a choice: whether to try for a vaginal birth, or book in for a repeat caesar.</p> <p>Those mulling over a vaginal birth are counselled at length about the risk of a rare but nasty outcome – the uterus rupturing while labour is in full flight.</p> <p>But new research looking at 130,000 births over five years has uncovered an increased risk of another outcome women deserve information about: extensive tearing around the vaginal region during birth.</p> <p>Our new study, <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34913246/">published</a> in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, hones in on the risk of vaginal trauma for those who birth vaginally after a prior caesarean. This kind of birth trauma relates to significant injury to a woman’s perineum, the important region between the vagina and anus. The perineum anchors many pelvic floor muscles that help control the bladder and bowels.</p> <p>We defined serious birth injury as a tear in the perineum that <a href="https://www.thewomens.org.au/images/uploads/fact-sheets/Perineal-tears-third-and-fourth-degree.pdf">extends</a> into the anal sphincter – the delicate ring of muscle that helps us control our bowels. Damage to this muscle is called a third-degree perineal tear.</p> <h2>What we studied</h2> <p>The study looked at 130,000 births in Victoria and compared the risk of a third-degree perinatal tear among first-time mums with those who birth vaginally after a prior caesarean (sometimes referred to as a <a href="https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/vaginal-birth-after-cesarean-delivery">VBAC</a>). In our study, vaginal birth included women birthed without any medical assistance, and births by forceps or the ventouse (vacuum birth). Anything but birth by caesarean.</p> <p>The results were clear: a vaginal birth after a previous caesarean increases the chance of significant vaginal trauma (third-degree tear) by 21% (albeit from a low baseline rate).</p> <p>A potential reason for this increased risk might include a mismatch between a uterus that has birthed before and a perineum that has not. If this is the case, the labour progresses quickly, which does not allow enough time for the perineum to stretch naturally. However, the real reason for this risk is unknown and further research is needed.</p> <h2>Lifelong impacts</h2> <p>Once a vaginal birth injury occurs, the tears are immediately repaired by obstetricians. Many women heal fully – but some who sustain a third-degree tear during birth develop distressing issues that never disappear, despite expert care, including from specialist physiotherapists.</p> <p>Symptoms can include an ongoing dragging sensation in the pelvic floor, or true prolapse of the vaginal walls. Sometimes, coughing or sneezing can cause urine leakage. And for some, jogging becomes too hard due to leaking of urine and pelvic discomfort. Others might suffer from reduced faecal control and even the odd episode of faecal soiling. Sex can be painful.</p> <p><a href="https://images.theconversation.com/files/442177/original/file-20220124-13-zzb927.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/442177/original/file-20220124-13-zzb927.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="woman with caesar scar holds baby" /></a> <span class="caption">Women who had a caesarean birth the first time around are at greater risk of serious birth injury from a subsequent vaginal birth.</span> <span class="attribution"><a href="https://image.shutterstock.com/image-photo/closeup-woman-belly-scar-cesarean-600w-1883782888.jpg" class="source">Shutterstock</a></span></p> <h2>This doesn’t mean women shouldn’t consider VBAC</h2> <p>This increased risk of injury does not make it unsafe for women who have had a caesarean before to try for a vaginal birth. But our results should be incorporated into counselling of these women about their choices.</p> <p>Since the risk of vaginal birth injury including the anal sphincter sits at <a href="https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-04/perineal_tears_ccs_v3.pdf">around 5-7%</a> in Victoria for first-time mothers, the increase of 21% raises the overall likelihood to around 6–8.5%. It’s a modest rise that will bother some, but not others.</p> <p>Still, women deserve to be given this information so they can judge for themselves whether it worries them enough to ask for a repeat caesarean, or try for a vaginal birth.</p> <p><a href="https://images.theconversation.com/files/442432/original/file-20220125-23-f3cuam.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/442432/original/file-20220125-23-f3cuam.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="pregnant woman in waiting room" /></a> <span class="caption">Birth counselling should fully explain the risks.</span> <span class="attribution"><a href="https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/pregnant-woman-courses-expectant-mothers-1185645562" class="source">Shutterstock</a></span></p> <p>Counselling is not just about cautioning women of the risks. As midwives and obstetricians, we talk with these women about what will happen when they go into labour, when to come into hospital, and what their chance (and definition) of “successful” vaginal birth might be.</p> <p>We also mention the most enticing advantage for those whose destiny is an uncomplicated vaginal birth – they sidestep another caesar. Often, this means a <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17181678/">shorter recovery time</a> and <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23186385/">improved likelihood of breastfeeding</a>.</p> <p>After these discussions, some women will feel the very small risk of serious vaginal trauma (or <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001184">uterine rupture</a>) is one well worth taking and opt to try for a vaginal birth. Others will opt for the certainty of a repeat caesarean.</p> <p>Women deserve full support in their birth choices. And they deserve to be fully informed about possible risks. It’s time we broaden our discussions with women planning a vaginal birth after caesarean section to include the increased risk of vaginal birth trauma.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/173249/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></p> <p><span><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/anthea-lindquist-1296574">Anthea Lindquist</a>, Obstetrician and Perinatal Epidemiologist, <em><a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/the-university-of-melbourne-722">The University of Melbourne</a></em> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/stephen-tong-1310350">Stephen Tong</a>, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, <em><a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/the-university-of-melbourne-722">The University of Melbourne</a></em></span></p> <p>This article is republished from <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/vaginal-birth-after-caesarean-increases-the-risk-of-serious-perineal-tear-by-20-our-large-scale-review-shows-173249">original article</a>.</p> <p><em>Image: Shutterstock</em></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Woman gives birth while in a coma

<p>A UK woman certainly has a story to tell her son when he grows up – she gave birth to him while in a coma! Danielle Johnson from Manchester in the UK went into labour five weeks before she was due after she caught pneumonia. To save the lives of both Danielle and her baby, doctors were forced to place the 24-year-old mother into an induced coma.</p> <p>While she was out, surgeons delivered the baby – a perfectly healthy boy weighing six pounds. After three weeks of trying to awaken Danielle from her coma, she opened her eyes at last. But, there was trouble ahead.</p> <p>When she finally woke up, she couldn’t believe her son was alive and was convinced the nurses were trying to kill her. Before even met her newborn, now 24 days old, she attacked her brother because she refused to believe her son was truly alive. Four days later, she saw him for the first time.</p> <p>“When it sunk in that what went on in my head didn't actually happen – it was such a relief,” she told the <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4222870/The-mother-took-3-months-cuddle-baby.html" target="_blank"><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Daily Mail</span></em></strong></a>. “I was very emotional. I just remember thinking “thank God for that – he's fine, everything's fine.’”</p> <p>At first, Danielle struggled to form a bond with the baby, now named Lucas – in fact, it took three months of recovery for her to hold him for the first time. Now, one year after the terrifying ordeal, Danielle and her son are closer than ever.</p> <p><strong>Related links:</strong></p> <p><a href="/news/news/2017/02/why-an-older-brother-is-named-best-dad-at-a-father-daughter-dance/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong>Why an older brother is named best dad at a father-daughter dance</strong></em></span></a></p> <p><a href="/news/news/2017/02/boy-writes-the-sweetest-valentines-day-card/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong>Boy writes the sweetest Valentine’s Day card</strong></em></span></a></p> <p><a href="/news/news/2017/02/students-raise-600-dollars-in-single-night-for-dogs-surgery/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong>Students raise $600 in a single night for dog’s surgery</strong></em></span></a></p>

News

Over 60

© Copyright 2024 OverSixty.All Rights Reserved.