Placeholder Content Image

Will AI ever reach human-level intelligence? We asked 5 experts

<p>Artificial intelligence has changed form in recent years.</p> <p>What started in the public eye as a burgeoning field with promising (yet largely benign) applications, has snowballed into a <a href="https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market">more than US$100 billion</a> industry where the heavy hitters – Microsoft, Google and OpenAI, to name a few – seem <a href="https://theconversation.com/bard-bing-and-baidu-how-big-techs-ai-race-will-transform-search-and-all-of-computing-199501">intent on out-competing</a> one another.</p> <p>The result has been increasingly sophisticated large language models, often <a href="https://theconversation.com/everyones-having-a-field-day-with-chatgpt-but-nobody-knows-how-it-actually-works-196378">released in haste</a> and without adequate testing and oversight. </p> <p>These models can do much of what a human can, and in many cases do it better. They can beat us at <a href="https://theconversation.com/an-ai-named-cicero-can-beat-humans-in-diplomacy-a-complex-alliance-building-game-heres-why-thats-a-big-deal-195208">advanced strategy games</a>, generate <a href="https://theconversation.com/ai-art-is-everywhere-right-now-even-experts-dont-know-what-it-will-mean-189800">incredible art</a>, <a href="https://theconversation.com/breast-cancer-diagnosis-by-ai-now-as-good-as-human-experts-115487">diagnose cancers</a> and compose music.</p> <p>There’s no doubt AI systems appear to be “intelligent” to some extent. But could they ever be as intelligent as humans? </p> <p>There’s a term for this: artificial general intelligence (AGI). Although it’s a broad concept, for simplicity you can think of AGI as the point at which AI acquires human-like generalised cognitive capabilities. In other words, it’s the point where AI can tackle any intellectual task a human can.</p> <p>AGI isn’t here yet; current AI models are held back by a lack of certain human traits such as true creativity and emotional awareness. </p> <p>We asked five experts if they think AI will ever reach AGI, and five out of five said yes.</p> <p>But there are subtle differences in how they approach the question. From their responses, more questions emerge. When might we achieve AGI? Will it go on to surpass humans? And what constitutes “intelligence”, anyway? </p> <p>Here are their detailed responses. </p> <p><strong>Paul Formosa: AI and Philosophy of Technology</strong></p> <p>AI has already achieved and surpassed human intelligence in many tasks. It can beat us at strategy games such as Go, chess, StarCraft and Diplomacy, outperform us on many <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-34591-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">language performance</a>benchmarks, and write <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-ai-writing-college-student-essays/672371/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">passable undergraduate</a> university essays. </p> <p>Of course, it can also make things up, or “hallucinate”, and get things wrong – but so can humans (although not in the same ways). </p> <p>Given a long enough timescale, it seems likely AI will achieve AGI, or “human-level intelligence”. That is, it will have achieved proficiency across enough of the interconnected domains of intelligence humans possess. Still, some may worry that – despite AI achievements so far – AI will not really be “intelligent” because it doesn’t (or can’t) understand what it’s doing, since it isn’t conscious. </p> <p>However, the rise of AI suggests we can have intelligence without consciousness, because intelligence can be understood in functional terms. An intelligent entity can do intelligent things such as learn, reason, write essays, or use tools. </p> <p>The AIs we create may never have consciousness, but they are increasingly able to do intelligent things. In some cases, they already do them at a level beyond us, which is a trend that will likely continue.</p> <p><strong>Christina Maher: Computational Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering</strong></p> <p>AI will achieve human-level intelligence, but perhaps not anytime soon. Human-level intelligence allows us to reason, solve problems and make decisions. It requires many cognitive abilities including adaptability, social intelligence and learning from experience. </p> <p>AI already ticks many of these boxes. What’s left is for AI models to learn inherent human traits such as critical reasoning, and understanding what emotion is and which events might prompt it. </p> <p>As humans, we learn and experience these traits from the moment we’re born. Our first experience of “happiness” is too early for us to even remember. We also learn critical reasoning and emotional regulation throughout childhood, and develop a sense of our “emotions” as we interact with and experience the world around us. Importantly, it can take many years for the human brain to develop such intelligence. </p> <p>AI hasn’t acquired these capabilities yet. But if humans can learn these traits, AI probably can too – and maybe at an even faster rate. We are still discovering how AI models should be built, trained, and interacted with in order to develop such traits in them. Really, the big question is not if AI will achieve human-level intelligence, but when – and how.</p> <p><strong>Seyedali Mirjalili: AI and Swarm Intelligence</strong></p> <p>I believe AI will surpass human intelligence. Why? The past offers insights we can't ignore. A lot of people believed tasks such as playing computer games, image recognition and content creation (among others) could only be done by humans – but technological advancement proved otherwise. </p> <p>Today the rapid advancement and adoption of AI algorithms, in conjunction with an abundance of data and computational resources, has led to a level of intelligence and automation previously unimaginable. If we follow the same trajectory, having more generalised AI is no longer a possibility, but a certainty of the future. </p> <p>It is just a matter of time. AI has advanced significantly, but not yet in tasks requiring intuition, empathy and creativity, for example. But breakthroughs in algorithms will allow this. </p> <p>Moreover, once AI systems achieve such human-like cognitive abilities, there will be a snowball effect and AI systems will be able to improve themselves with minimal to no human involvement. This kind of “automation of intelligence” will profoundly change the world. </p> <p>Artificial general intelligence remains a significant challenge, and there are ethical and societal implications that must be addressed very carefully as we continue to advance towards it.</p> <p><strong>Dana Rezazadegan: AI and Data Science</strong></p> <p>Yes, AI is going to get as smart as humans in many ways – but exactly how smart it gets will be decided largely by advancements in <a href="https://thequantuminsider.com/2020/01/23/four-ways-quantum-computing-will-change-artificial-intelligence-forever/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">quantum computing</a>. </p> <p>Human intelligence isn’t as simple as knowing facts. It has several aspects such as creativity, emotional intelligence and intuition, which current AI models can mimic, but can’t match. That said, AI has advanced massively and this trend will continue. </p> <p>Current models are limited by relatively small and biased training datasets, as well as limited computational power. The emergence of quantum computing will transform AI’s capabilities. With quantum-enhanced AI, we’ll be able to feed AI models multiple massive datasets that are comparable to humans’ natural multi-modal data collection achieved through interacting with the world. These models will be able to maintain fast and accurate analyses. </p> <p>Having an advanced version of continual learning should lead to the development of highly sophisticated AI systems which, after a certain point, will be able to improve themselves without human input. </p> <p>As such, AI algorithms running on stable quantum computers have a high chance of reaching something similar to generalised human intelligence – even if they don’t necessarily match every aspect of human intelligence as we know it.</p> <p><strong>Marcel Scharth: Machine Learning and AI Alignment</strong></p> <p>I think it’s likely AGI will one day become a reality, although the timeline remains highly uncertain. If AGI is developed, then surpassing human-level intelligence seems inevitable. </p> <p>Humans themselves are proof that highly flexible and adaptable intelligence is allowed by the laws of physics. There’s no <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">fundamental reason</a> we should believe that machines are, in principle, incapable of performing the computations necessary to achieve human-like problem solving abilities. </p> <p>Furthermore, AI has <a href="https://philarchive.org/rec/SOTAOA" target="_blank" rel="noopener">distinct advantages</a> over humans, such as better speed and memory capacity, fewer physical constraints, and the potential for more rationality and recursive self-improvement. As computational power grows, AI systems will eventually surpass the human brain’s computational capacity. </p> <p>Our primary challenge then is to gain a better understanding of intelligence itself, and knowledge on how to build AGI. Present-day AI systems have many limitations and are nowhere near being able to master the different domains that would characterise AGI. The path to AGI will likely require unpredictable breakthroughs and innovations. </p> <p>The median predicted date for AGI on <a href="https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5121/date-of-artificial-general-intelligence/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Metaculus</a>, a well-regarded forecasting platform, is 2032. To me, this seems too optimistic. A 2022 <a href="https://aiimpacts.org/2022-expert-survey-on-progress-in-ai/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">expert survey</a> estimated a 50% chance of us achieving human-level AI by 2059. I find this plausible.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Shutterstock</em></p> <p><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://theconversation.com/will-ai-ever-reach-human-level-intelligence-we-asked-5-experts-202515" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Conversation</a>. </em></p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Artificial Intelligence makes Cosmo cover debut

<p dir="ltr">Though Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been around since the 1950s and has been used for everything from predicting how much toilet paper stores should stock (Covid times notwithstanding) to <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556641" target="_blank" rel="noopener">helping doctors make the best decisions for their patients</a>, more creative applications are still in relative infancy - though the latest <em>Cosmopolitan</em>’s latest efforts have pushed efforts forward.</p> <p dir="ltr">With <em>Cosmopolitan</em>’s latest cover, a team of the magazine’s editors, members of artificial-intelligence research lab Open AI, and digital artist Karen X Cheng - the first “real-world” person to use the AI system the researchers have developed - went through the lengthy process to create it.</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-eba60aa4-7fff-6d58-c649-5f9bef9deaac"></span></p> <p dir="ltr">Though the AI system - called DALL-E 2 - takes just 20 seconds to create an image using verbal requests from users, it took the team several rounds of selecting phrases that would help the system generate the image of a powerful woman that would grace the cover.</p> <blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CfEls6Gr6Pa/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"> </div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"> <div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"> </div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CfEls6Gr6Pa/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Cosmopolitan (@cosmopolitan)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p dir="ltr">Cheng, who <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CfEwohiJdXW/?hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noopener">shared</a> the process on social media, revealed the final phrase that resulted in the magazine’s final cover: “A wide angle shot from below of a female astronaut with an athletic feminine body walking with swagger towards camera on Mars in an infinite universe, synthwave digital art”.</p> <p dir="ltr">DALL-E 2 is powered by a neural network and learns to identify objects and how they relate to each other using images labelled by humans. By being shown numerous images of jam jars and lemon tarts, each labelled with what the image contains, the AI learns how to identify and distinguish between them.</p> <p dir="ltr">That being said, DALL-E 2 is far from perfect and is still in “preview” phase, meaning it is only being released to a thousand users a week while engineers continue to tweak it.</p> <p dir="ltr">It is also far from replacing human artists, a fear held by some who are wary of the tech. It requires plenty of intervention from humans, and, as writer Gloria Liu puts it: “DALL-E truly is an artist’s tool - one that can’t create without the artist”.</p> <p dir="ltr"><span id="docs-internal-guid-2bd774a4-7fff-ced0-b26b-3caecb9ab1fe"></span></p> <p dir="ltr">To read the full <em>Cosmopolitan </em>story, head <a href="https://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/a40314356/dall-e-2-artificial-intelligence-cover/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>.</p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Artificial intelligence tool learns “song of the reef” to determine ecosystem health

<p class="spai-bg-prepared">Coral reefs are among Earth’s most stunning and biodiverse ecosystems. Yet, due to human-induced climate change resulting in warmer oceans, we are seeing growing numbers of these living habitats dying.</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">The urgency of the crisis facing coral reefs around the world was highlighted in a recent <a class="spai-bg-prepared" href="https://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/the-reef/reef-health" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">study</a> that showed that 91% of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef had experienced coral bleaching in the summer of 2021–22 due to heat stress from rising water temperatures.</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">Determining reef health is key to gauging the extent of the problem and developing ways of intervening to save these ecosystems, and a new artificial intelligence (AI) tool has been developed to measure reef health using… sound.</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">Research coming out of the UK is using AI to study the soundscape of Indonesian reefs to determine the health of the ecosystems. The results, <a class="spai-bg-prepared" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004575?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">published</a> in <em class="spai-bg-prepared">Ecological Indicators</em>, shows that the AI tool could learn the “song of the reef” and determine reef health with 92% accuracy.</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">The findings are being used to track the progress of reef restoration.</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">“Coral reefs are facing multiple threats, including climate change, so monitoring their health and the success of conservation projects is vital,” says lead author Ben Williams of the UK’s University of Exeter.</p> <div class="newsletter-box spai-bg-prepared"> <div id="wpcf7-f6-p193163-o1" class="wpcf7 spai-bg-prepared" dir="ltr" lang="en-US" role="form"> </div> </div> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">“One major difficulty is that visual and acoustic surveys of reefs usually rely on labour-intensive methods. Visual surveys are also limited by the fact that many reef creatures conceal themselves, or are active at night, while the complexity of reef sounds has made it difficult to identify reef health using individual recordings.</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">“Our approach to that problem was to use machine learning – to see whether a computer could learn the song of the reef. Our findings show that a computer can pick up patterns that are undetectable to the human ear. It can tell us faster, and more accurately, how the reef is doing.”</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">Fish and other creatures make a variety of sounds in coral reefs. While the meaning of many of these calls remains a mystery, the new machine-learning algorithm can distinguish overall between healthy and unhealthy reefs.</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">Recordings used in the study were taken at the <a class="spai-bg-prepared" href="http://www.buildingcoral.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mars Coral Reef Restoration Project</a>, which is restoring heavily damaged reefs in Indonesia.</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">The study’s co-author Dr Tim Lamont, a marine biologist at Lancaster University, said the AI method provides advantages in monitoring coral reefs.</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">“This is a really exciting development,” says Lamont. “Sound recorders and AI could be used around the world to monitor the health of reefs, and discover whether attempts to protect and restore them are working.</p> <p class="spai-bg-prepared">“In many cases it’s easier and cheaper to deploy an underwater hydrophone on a reef and leave it there than to have expert divers visiting the reef repeatedly to survey it, especially in remote locations.”</p> <p><img id="cosmos-post-tracker" class="spai-bg-prepared" style="opacity: 0; height: 1px!important; width: 1px!important; border: 0!important; position: absolute!important; z-index: -1!important;" src="https://syndication.cosmosmagazine.com/?id=193163&amp;title=Artificial+intelligence+tool+learns+%E2%80%9Csong+of+the+reef%E2%80%9D+to+determine+ecosystem+health" width="1" height="1" /></p> <div id="contributors"> <p><em><a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/technology/artificial-intelligence-reef-song/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">This article</a> was originally published on <a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Cosmos Magazine</a> and was written by <a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/contributor/evrim-yazgin" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Evrim Yazgin</a>. Evrim Yazgin has a Bachelor of Science majoring in mathematical physics and a Master of Science in physics, both from the University of Melbourne.</em></p> <p><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p> </div>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Artificial intelligence could sway your dating and voting preferences

<div> <div class="copy"> <p>AI algorithms on our computers and smartphones have quickly become a pervasive part of everyday life, with relatively little attention to their scope, integrity, and how they shape our attitudes and behaviours.</p> <p>Spanish researchers have now shown experimentally that people’s voting and dating preferences can be manipulated depending on the type of persuasion used.</p> <p>“Every day, new headlines appear in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) has overtaken human capacity in new and different domains,” <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249454" target="_blank">write</a> Ujue Agudo and Helena Matute, from the Universidad de Deusto, in the journal <em>PLOS ONE</em>.</p> <p>“This results in recommendation and persuasion algorithms being widely used nowadays, offering people advice on what to read, what to buy, where to eat, or whom to date,” they add.</p> <p>“[P]eople often assume that these AI judgements are objective, efficient and reliable; a phenomenon known as <em>machine bias</em>.”</p> <p>But increasingly, <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6404/751.full" target="_blank">warning bells</a> are sounding about how people could be influenced on vital issues. Agudo and Matute note, for instance, that companies such as Facebook and Google have been <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/feb/18/a-digital-gangster-destroying-democracy-the-damning-verdict-on-facebook" target="_blank">accused </a>of manipulating democratic elections.</p> <p>And while some people may be wary of explicit attempts to sway their judgements, they could be influenced without realising it.</p> <p>“[I]t is not only a question of whether AI could influence people through explicit recommendation and persuasion, but also of whether AI can influence human decisions through more covert persuasion and manipulation techniques,” the researchers write.</p> <p>“Indeed, some studies show that AI can make use of human heuristics and biases in order to manipulate people’s decisions in a subtle way.”</p> <p>A famous <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11421" target="_blank">experiment</a> on voting behaviour in the US, for instance, showed how Facebook messages swayed political opinions, information seeking and votes of more than 61 million people in 2010, a phenomenon they say was demonstrated again in 2012 elections.</p> <p>In another example, <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/112/33/E4512.full.pdf" target="_blank">manipulating the order </a>of political candidates in search engines or boosting someone’s profile to <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://core.ac.uk/display/132807884" target="_blank">enhance their familiarity </a>and credibility are other covert ploys that can funnel votes to selected candidates.  </p> <p>Worryingly, as Agudo and Matute point out, these strategies tend to go unnoticed, so that people are likely to think they made their own minds up and don’t realise they’ve been played.</p> <p>Yet public research on the impact of these influences is way behind the private sector.</p> <p>“Companies with potential conflicts of interest are conducting private behavioural experiments and accessing the data of millions of people without their informed consent,” they write, “something unthinkable for the academic research community.”</p> <p>While some studies have shown that AI can influence people’s moods, friendships, dates, activities and prices paid online, as well as political preferences, research is scarce, the pair says, and has not disentangled explicit and covert influences.</p> <p>To help address this, they recruited more than 1300 people online for a series of experiments to investigate how explicit and covert AI algorithms influence their choice of fictitious political candidates and potential romantic partners.</p> <p>Results showed that explicit, but not covert, recommendation of candidates swayed people’s votes, while secretly manipulating their familiarity with potential partners influenced who they wanted to date.</p> <p>Although these results held up under various approaches, the researchers note the possibilities are vast. “The number of variables that might be changed, and the number of biases that an algorithm could exploit is immense,” they write.</p> <p>“It is important to note, however, that the speed with which human academic scientists can perform new experiments and collect new data is very slow, as compared to the easiness with which many AI companies and their algorithms are already conducting experiments with millions of human beings on a daily basis through the internet.”</p> <p>Private companies have immense resources and are unfettered in their pursuit of the most effective algorithms, they add. “Therefore, their ability to influence decisions both explicitly and covertly is certainly much higher than shown in the present research.”</p> <p>The pair draws attention to the European Union’s Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI and DARPA’s explainable AI program as examples of initiatives to increase people’s trust of AI. But they assert that won’t address the dearth of information on how algorithms can manipulate people’s decisions.</p> <p>“Therefore, a human-centric approach should not only aim to establish the critical requirements for AI’s trustworthiness,” they write, “but also to minimise the consequences of that trust on human decisions and freedom.</p> <p>“It is of critical importance to educate people against following the advice of algorithms blindly,” they add, as well as public discussion on who should own the masses of data which are used to create persuasive algorithms.</p> <em>Image credits: Shutterstock            <!-- Start of tracking content syndication. Please do not remove this section as it allows us to keep track of republished articles --> <img id="cosmos-post-tracker" style="opacity: 0; height: 1px!important; width: 1px!important; border: 0!important; position: absolute!important; z-index: -1!important;" src="https://syndication.cosmosmagazine.com/?id=148292&amp;title=Artificial+intelligence+could+sway+your+dating+and+voting+preferences" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> <!-- End of tracking content syndication -->          </em></div> <div id="contributors"> <p><em>This article was originally published on <a rel="noopener" href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/technology/artificial-intelligence-could-sway-your-dating-and-voting-preferences/" target="_blank">cosmosmagazine.com</a> and was written by Natalie Parletta.</em></p> </div> </div>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Artificial intelligence recreates destroyed paintings

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A new interactive hub founded by </span><a href="https://artsandculture.google.com/entity/gustav-klimt/m03869?hl=en"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Google Arts &amp; Culture</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> is showcasing an exclusive Gustav Klimt exhibition that offers insight into Klimt’s </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">biography, artistic inspiration and legacy.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As part of the initiative, Google has digitally recreated three iconic Klimt works that were previously lost to a fire in 1899. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">By utilising artificial intelligence, technology has colourised the black and white photographs of the artworks. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The three paintings, titled </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Medicine</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Philosophy</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">, and </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jurisprudence</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">, collectively form the “Faculty Paintings,” which were commissioned by the University of Vienna. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Officials at the university originally deemed the works “pornographic” and “perverse” upon their unveiling, before ultimately being sold to a private buyer. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The paintings were lost in a fire during the final days of World War II in 1945, and only survived in a series of photographs. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">AI researchers and Klimt scholars were supported by those at Google to bring colour to these enigmatic paintings and give them a second opportunity in the spotlight. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">After much back and forth to make the recreation as accurate as possible, the AI-coloured images provide what might be the closest we will ever get to seeing a complete image of those lost paintings. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In a statement from Franz Smola, curator at the Belvedere museum, he said “The result for me was surprising because we were able to colour it even in the places where we had no knowledge, with machine learning we have good assumptions that Klimt used certain colours.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The use of this revolutionary technology shows hope for the future of famous painting recreations that would have otherwise been lost forever.</span></p> <p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Image credit: Google Arts &amp; Culture</span></em></p>

Art

Placeholder Content Image

4 signs you have high emotional intelligence

<p>Emotional intelligence can mean the difference between behaving in a socially acceptable way and being considered to be way out of line. While most people will have heard of emotional intelligence, not many people really know how to spot it – in themselves or in others.</p> <p>Emotional intelligence is essentially the way you perceive, understand, express, and manage emotions. And it’s important because the more you understand these aspects of yourself, the better your mental health and social behaviour will be.</p> <p>It might be these are things you do without even really thinking – which can be the case for a lot of people. Or it might be that these are skills you know you need to work on.</p> <p>Either way, improved emotional intelligence can be very useful in all sorts of circumstances – be it in work, at home, in school, or even when you’re just socialising with your friends.</p> <p>So if you want to know if you’re emotionally intelligent, simply check the list below.</p> <p><strong>1. You think about your reactions</strong></p> <p>Emotional intelligence can mean the difference between a good reaction and a bad reaction to circumstances. Emotions can contain important information that can be useful to personal and social functioning – but sometimes these emotions can also overwhelm us, and make us act in ways we would rather not.</p> <p>People who lack emotional intelligence are more likely to just react, without giving themselves the time to weigh up the pros and cons of a situation and really thinking things through.</p> <p>People who are less able to regulate their negative feelings are also more likely to have difficulty functioning socially – which can exacerbate depressive feelings.</p> <p>People with <a href="https://www.helpguide.org/articles/depression/depression-signs-and-symptoms.htm">major depression</a> have been shown to have <a href="http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1754073916650494">difficulties</a> understanding and managing their emotions. And research has also shown that more depressive symptoms are present in people with lower emotional intelligence – even if they are not clinically depressed.</p> <p><strong>2. You see situations as a challenge</strong></p> <p>If you are able to recognise negative emotions in yourself and see difficult <a href="http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1754073916650497">situations as a challenge</a> – focusing on the positives and persevering – chances are that you’ve got high emotional intelligence.</p> <p>Imagine for a moment you lost your job. An emotionally intelligent person might perceive their emotions as cues to take action, both to deal with the challenges and to control their thoughts and feelings.</p> <p>But someone with poor emotional skills might <a href="http://www.apa.org/monitor/nov05/cycle.aspx">ruminate</a> on their job loss, come to think of themselves as hopelessly unemployable, and spiral into depression.</p> <p><strong>3. You can modify your emotions</strong></p> <p>Of course, there are times when your feelings can get the better of you, but if you are an emotionally intelligent person, it is likely that when this happens you have the skills needed to modify your emotions.</p> <p>For example, while average levels of anxiety can improve cognitive performance – probably by increasing focus and motivation – too much anxiety can block cognitive achievement.</p> <p>So knowing how to find the sweet spot, between too much and too little anxiety, can be a useful tool.</p> <p>It is clear that <a href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-brain-and-emotional-intelligence/201203/the-sweet-spot-achievement">moderation</a> is the key when it comes to managing our emotions. Emotionally intelligent people know this and have the skills to modify their emotions appropriately.</p> <p>And this is probably why emotional intelligence has been shown to be <a href="http://emotional.intelligence.uma.es/documentos/pdf60among_adolescents.pdf">related</a> to lower levels of anxiety.</p> <p><strong>4. You can put yourself in other people’s shoes</strong></p> <p>If you are able to extend these skills beyond your own personal functioning, then that’s another sign that you have high levels of emotional intelligence.</p> <p>Emotional intelligence can be particularly important in workplaces that require heavy “<a href="https://hbr.org/2016/09/managing-the-hidden-stress-of-emotional-labor">emotional labour</a>” – where workers must manage their emotions according to organisational rules.</p> <p>This can include customer service jobs, where workers may need to sympathise with customers – despite the fact that customers may be yelling at them.</p> <p>This is why workplace emotional intelligence training is now common – with the <a href="http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1754073916650496">most effective training</a> focusing on management and expression of emotions, which are directly linked to communication and job performance.</p> <p>It’s also worth pointing out that emotional intelligence is a cognitive ability that can improve across your <a href="http://www.livescience.com/37134-emotional-intelligence-improve-aging.html">lifespan</a>. So if you haven’t recognised much of yourself in the traits listed above, fear not, there’s still time for you to work on your emotional intelligence.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/71165/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: http://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></p> <p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/jose-m-mestre-286147">Jose M. Mestre</a>, Professor of Emotion and Motivation, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/universidad-de-cadiz-2934">Universidad de Cádiz</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/kimberly-a-barchard-285790">Kimberly A. Barchard</a>, Associate Professor in Quantitative Psychology, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-nevada-las-vegas-826">University of Nevada, Las Vegas</a></em></p> <p><em>This article is republished from <a href="http://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/four-signs-you-have-high-emotional-intelligence-71165">original article</a>.</em></p>

Mind

Placeholder Content Image

“Nerd” or “wrongdoer”: How artificial intelligence will label you in the future

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tabong Kima logged onto Twitter one morning and saw a hashtag that said #ImageNetRoulette.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The site allows users to upload photos and artificial intelligence would analyse each face and describe what it saw.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">One photo pegged a man as an “orphan” where another photo, where the person was wearing glasses, was labelled a “grind, nerd, wonk and dweeb”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kima, an African American, didn’t like what he saw when he uploaded his photo.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The site tagged him as a “wrongdoer” and an “offender”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I might have a bad sense of humour,” he </span><a href="https://twitter.com/TabKim2/status/1174330442385907712?s=19">tweeted</a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, “but I don’t think this is particularly funny”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">ImageNet Roulette is a digital art project that’s intended to shine a light on the unsound and offensive behaviour that can creep into artificial intelligence technologies.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"></span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Artificial intelligence technology is rapidly infiltrating its way into our everyday lives, including the facial-recognition services used by internet companies and police departments.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">ImageNet Roulette, designed by American artist Trevor Paglen and Microsoft researcher Kate Crawford, aims to show the depth of this problem.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We want to show how layers of bias and racism and misogyny move from one system to the next,” Paglen said in a phone interview from Paris.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The point is to let people see the work that is being done behind the scenes, to see how we are being processed and categorised all the time.”</span></p> <p> </p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Call for independent watchdog to monitor NZ government use of artificial intelligence

<p>New Zealand is a leader in government use of artificial intelligence (AI). It is part of a<span> </span><a href="https://www.digital.govt.nz/digital-government/international-partnerships/the-digital-9/">global network of countries</a><span> </span>that use predictive algorithms in government decision making, for anything from the optimal scheduling of public hospital beds to whether an offender should be released from prison, based on their likelihood of reoffending, or the<span> </span><a href="https://www.acc.co.nz/about-us/news-media/latest-news/acc-speeds-up-claims-approval/">efficient processing of simple insurance claims</a>.</p> <p>But the official use of AI algorithms in government has been<span> </span><a href="https://www.data.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Algorithm-Assessment-Report-Oct-2018.pdf">in the spotlight in recent years</a>. On the plus side, AI can enhance the accuracy, efficiency and fairness of day-to-day decision making. But concerns have also been expressed regarding transparency, meaningful human control, data protection and bias.</p> <p>In a<span> </span><a href="https://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/research/ai/AI-Law/NZLF%20report.pdf">report</a><span> </span>released, we recommend New Zealand establish a new independent regulator to monitor and address the risks associated with these digital technologies.</p> <p><strong>AI and transparency</strong></p> <p>There are three important issues regarding transparency.</p> <p>One relates to the inspectability of algorithms. Some aspects of New Zealand government practice are reassuring. Unlike some countries that use commercial AI products, New Zealand has tended to build government AI tools in-house. This means that we know how the tools work.</p> <p>But intelligibility is another issue. Knowing how an AI system works<span> </span><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-018-0330-6">doesn’t guarantee</a><span> </span>the decisions it reaches will be understood by the people affected. The best performing AI systems are often extremely complex.</p> <p>To make explanations intelligible, additional technology is required. A decision-making system can be supplemented with an “explanation system”. These are additional algorithms “bolted on” to the main algorithm we seek to understand. Their job is to construct simpler models of how the underlying algorithms work – simple enough to be understandable to people. We believe explanation systems will be increasingly important as AI technology advances.</p> <p>A final type of transparency relates to public access to information about the AI systems used in government. The public should know what AI systems their government uses as well as how well they perform. Systems should be regularly evaluated and summary results made available to the public in a systematic format.</p> <p><strong>New Zealand’s law and transparency</strong></p> <p>Our<span> </span><a href="https://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/research/ai/AI-Law/NZLF%20report.pdf">report</a><span> </span>takes a detailed look at how well New Zealand law currently handles these transparency issues.</p> <p>New Zealand doesn’t have laws specifically tailored towards algorithms, but some are relevant in this context. For instance, New Zealand’s Official Information Act (<a href="http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1982/0156/107.0/DLM65628.html">OIA</a>) provides a right to reasons for decisions by official agencies, and this is likely to apply to algorithmic decisions just as much as human ones. This is in<span> </span><a href="http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/SydLawRw/2015/22.html">notable contrast to Australia</a>, which doesn’t impose a general duty on public officials to provide reasons for their decisions.</p> <p>But even the OIA would come up short where decisions are made or supported by opaque decision systems. That is why we recommend that predictive algorithms used by government, whether developed commercially or in-house, must feature in a public register, must be publicly inspectable, and (if necessary) must be supplemented with explanation systems.</p> <p><strong>Human control and data protection</strong></p> <p>Another issue relates to human control. Some of the concerns around algorithmic decision-making are best addressed by making sure there is a “human in the loop,” with a human having final sign off on any important decision. However, we don’t think this is likely to be an adequate solution in the most important cases.</p> <p>A persistent theme of research in industrial psychology is that humans become overly trusting and uncritical of automated systems, especially when those systems are reliable most of the time. Just adding a human “in the loop” will not always produce better outcomes. Indeed in certain contexts, human collaboration will offer false reassurance, rendering AI-assisted decisions<span> </span><a href="https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/effective-forecasting-and-judgmental-adjustments-an-empirical-eva">less accurate</a>.</p> <p>With respect to data protection, we flag the problem of “inferred data”. This is data inferred about people rather than supplied by them directly (just as when Amazon infers that you might like a certain book on the basis of books it knows you have purchased). Among other recommendations, our report calls for New Zealand to consider the legal status of inferred data, and whether it should be treated the same way as primary data.</p> <p><strong>Bias and discrimination</strong></p> <p>A final area of concern is bias. Computer systems might look unbiased, but if they are relying on “dirty data” from previous decisions, they could have the effect of “baking in” discriminatory assumptions and practices. New Zealand’s anti-discrimination laws are likely to apply to algorithmic decisions, but making sure discrimination doesn’t creep back in will require ongoing monitoring.</p> <p>The report also notes that while “individual rights” — for example, against discrimination — are important, we<span> </span><a href="https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dltr/vol16/iss1/2/">can’t entirely rely on them</a><span> </span>to guard against all of these risks. For one thing, affected people will often be those with the least economic or political power. So while they may have the “right” not to be discriminated against, it will be cold comfort to them if they have no way of enforcing it.</p> <p>There is also the danger that they won’t be able to see the whole picture, to know whether an algorithm’s decisions are affecting different sections of the community differently. To enable a broader discussion about bias, public evaluation of AI tools should arguably include results for specific sub-populations, as well as for the whole population.</p> <p>A new independent body will be essential if New Zealand wants to harness the benefits of algorithmic tools while avoiding or minimising their risks to the public.</p> <p><em>Alistair Knott, James Maclaurin and Joy Liddicoat, collaborators on the<span> </span><a href="https://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/research/ai/AI-Law/">AI and Law in New Zealand</a>project, have contributed to the writing of this piece.</em></p> <p><em>Written by John Zerilli and Colin Gavaghan. Republished with permission of <a href="https://theconversation.com/call-for-independent-watchdog-to-monitor-nz-government-use-of-artificial-intelligence-117589">The Conversation</a>.</em></p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Think Einstein was smart? Here are 8 people with higher IQs

<p><strong>1. Jacob Barnett: IQ 170</strong></p> <p>Jacob Barnett was <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/autistic-boy-genius-iq-higher-einstein-article-1.1340923">diagnosed</a> with moderate to severe autism at two years old, and doctors predicted he’d never learn to tie his own shoes.</p> <p>Needless to say, he’s mastered dressing himself. The American child prodigy finished grades six through twelve in less than a year, then went to college at age ten.</p> <p>He was a published physicist <a href="https://psmag.com/magazine/jacob-barnett-30-under-30">by the time he was 13</a>.</p> <p>Now he’s <a href="https://uwaterloo.ca/physics-astronomy/about/people/j3barnet">working toward his PhD</a> at age 19.</p> <p><strong>2. Judit Polgár: IQ 170</strong></p> <p>The Hungarian chess master is considered the best female chess player of all time.</p> <p>When she was 15 years and 4 months old in 1991, she was the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1992/02/04/news/youngest-grandmaster-ever-is-15-ferocious-and-female.html">youngest player</a> to become an International Grandmaster.</p> <p>She’s <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/smartest-person-in-the-world-2011-12/#bert-byrne-is-alleged-to-have-an-iq-of-170-3">reported</a> to have an IQ of 170.</p> <p><strong>3. Rick Rosner: IQ 192 to 198</strong></p> <p>Rick Rosner has taken <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/interview-with-rick-rosner-2014-11?r=UK&amp;IR=T">more than 30 IQ tests</a>, revealing his IQ is between 192 and 198, depending on how the tests define their scores.</p> <p>Before the allegedly second-smartest man in the world became a TV writer, he worked as a bouncer, stripper, and nude model.</p> <p>He famously <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/entertainment/lawsuit-millionaire-player-answer-article-1.927553">sued</a> ABC network for a faulty question after losing <em>Who Wants to Be a Millionaire</em> at the $16,000 level, but he lost the case.</p> <p><strong>4. Evangelos Katsioulis: IQ 198</strong></p> <p>With a score of 198, Evangelos Katsioulis, MD, MSc, MA, PhD, has the highest tested IQ in the world, according to the <a href="http://psiq.org/home.html">World Genius Directory</a>.</p> <p>The Greek psychiatrist also <a href="http://www.katsioulis.com/evangelos-katsioulis/">has degrees</a> in philosophy and medical research technology.</p> <p><strong>5. Sho Yano: IQ 200</strong></p> <p>American physician Sho Yano started college at age nine, and earned an MD and PhD <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/06/young-medical-student-graduate.html">by the time he was 21</a>.</p> <p>He has a black belt in tae kwon do and started composing music when he was four, but he’s put his focus on <a href="https://www.vitals.com/doctors/Dr_Sho_Yano.html">child neurology</a>.</p> <p><strong>6. Nathan Leopold: IQ 200</strong></p> <p>The infamous Nathan Leopold had an IQ of 200 and spoke nine languages by age 18, but he didn’t use his intelligence for the greater good.</p> <p>When he was 19, he and an accomplice were <a href="https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/leopold-and-loeb-gain-national-attention">arrested for murder</a> in 1924 after trying to commit the “perfect crime.”</p> <p>Leopold spent 33 years in jail before being released on parole.</p> <p><strong>7. Marilyn vos Savant: IQ 228</strong></p> <p>When Marilyn von Savant was ten years old, an adult-level Stanford-Binet test revealed she had an <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/4add9230-23d5-11de-996a-00144feabdc0">IQ of 228</a>, which later landed her a Guinness World Record until the company removed the category in 1990 because the numbers are considered inexact.</p> <p>She’s been answering philosophical and mathematical questions for <em>Parade</em> magazine readers in her “Ask Marilyn” <a href="https://parade.com/member/marilynvossavant/">column</a> since 1986</p> <p><strong>8. Ainan Cawley: IQ 263</strong></p> <p>This Irish child genius is <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3721556/The-smartest-40-people-time-revealed-List-includes-geniuses-Einstein-da-Vinci-s-number-one.html">projected</a> to have an IQ of 263.</p> <p>At eight years old, he was already taking third-year chemistry courses at Singapore Polytechnic, and by the time he was nine, he’d memorized the first 518 decimal places of pi.</p> <p>Now 18, he seems to have a knack for entertainment, having written the script and composed music <a href="https://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/irish-child-prodigy-puts-talent-to-use-for-typhoon-charity-254202.html">for a short film called <em>Reflection</em></a> at age 12. </p> <p><em>Written by Marissa LaLiberte. This article first appeared in </em><a href="http://www.readersdigest.com.au/true-stories-lifestyle/thought-provoking/think-einstein-was-smart-here-are-8-people-higher-iqs?items_per_page=All">Reader’s Digest.</a><em> For more of what you love from the world’s best-loved magazine, </em><a href="http://readersdigest.innovations.co.nz/c/readersdigestemailsubscribe?utm_source=over60&amp;utm_medium=articles&amp;utm_campaign=RDSUB&amp;keycode=WRN93V">Here’s our subscription offer.</a></p> <p> </p> <p><img style="width: 100px !important; height: 100px !important;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7820640/1.png" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/f30947086c8e47b89cb076eb5bb9b3e2" /></p>

Retirement Life

Placeholder Content Image

How artificial intelligence is scamming online daters

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Online dating is tricky for everyone. After all, anyone can be whoever they want to be on the internet.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">It doesn’t help that the majority of internet users think they can spot a dating scam from miles away and that it would never happen to them.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, thanks to new technology, it’s harder than ever to know if someone is being genuine over the internet. Scammers are constantly figuring out new ways to be deceptive </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">and gain people’s trust.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">There is a new artificial intelligence technology available called Deepfake. This technology is able to produce hyper realistic images and videos of people and situations that don’t exist and have never happened.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The videos look so realistic that it is hard to prove they are fake. For example, Barack Obama never called Donald Trump a “dips**t”, but this video would have you believing otherwise.</span></p> <p><iframe width="653" height="380" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cQ54GDm1eL0" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Unless you look very closely, you would believe that Obama had said this. There are small tips to look out for, such as blurring or distortion on the video, but they’re only visible when you know what to look for.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Phillip Wang, the man behind the website ThisPersonDoesNotExist.com told </span><a href="https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/security/how-disturbing-ai-technology-could-be-used-to-scam-online-daters/news-story/1be46dc7081613849d67b82566f8b421"><span style="font-weight: 400;">news.com.au</span></a> <span style="font-weight: 400;">that he created the site to prove a point to friends about AI technology.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I then decided to share it on an AI Facebook group to raise awareness for the current state of the art for this technology. It went viral from there.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Wang said he created the site to raise awareness about how easy it is to make a fake person. He also wants to raise awareness about the implications this technology could have in the future.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">It’s getting more and more difficult to tell deepfakes from reality, and Wang has said that it’s “beyond something that simple photoshop forensics can help defeat.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Have you dabbled at online dating? Let us know in the comments.</span></p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Princess Eugenie’s fiancé “not the most intelligent” admits his grandmother

<p>Princess Eugenie, 27, and her fiancé Jack Brooksbank, 31, are tipped to be tying the knot this October, and his grandmother has used her 15 minutes of fame to have a good-natured jibe at her grandson.</p> <p>Speaking to <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-5307519/Grandmother-happy-Eugenie-marrying-not-intelligent-grandson.html" target="_blank">MailOnline</a></strong></span>, Joanna Newton, 91, said, “I never thought he would get married to a royal. He’s a charming boy and all that but not the most intelligent and I would never have thought this would happen.”</p> <p>The couple announced their engagement showcasing Eugenie’s pink sapphire ring, and royal watchers went into a flurry claiming that the two were <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="/lifestyle/relationships/2018/01/are-princess-eugenie-and-her-fianc%C3%A9-jack-related/" target="_blank">actually related</a></span></strong>.</p> <p>Ms Newton called Jack a “good egg” and went on to tell the MailOnline that “I think it says a lot about Eugenie that it’s him she wants and it’s lovely.”</p> <p>It’s the second royal wedding to be held this year, with Prince Harry to marry Meghan Markle in May.</p> <p>What would your grandmother have said to the press about your engagement, if given the chance? Share your funny stories in the comments.</p>

Mind

Placeholder Content Image

10 signs of low emotional intelligence

<p>A few years back, experts came to realise that a person’s intelligence was not the most important element contributing to their life’s success. Emotional intelligence (sometimes referred to as EQ) can be harder to measure than IQ, but plays a significant role in every aspect of your life.</p> <p>Unfortunately, just as with the intelligence quotient, some people just don’t measure up. Here are some simple signs that you are low on the emotional intelligence scale.</p> <p><strong>1. No emotional control</strong> – Lashing out in anger; giving over to unprovoked fits of giddiness.</p> <p><strong>2. Easily stressed</strong> – Losing control of your temper; allowing your own feelings to negatively impact upon those around you.</p> <p><strong>3. Abundance of confidence</strong> – Being confident is good; being overconfident for no reason is not. Don’t brag, don’t assume you have all the answers.</p> <p><strong>4. Faltering friendships</strong> – Maintaining a network of friends and acquaintances is a sign of high E.Q.; the opposite tends to reflect a lack of emotional intelligence.</p> <p><strong>5. Unable to express emotions</strong> – A poker face is good for the card table, but not for everyday interactions.</p> <p><strong>6. Failure is catastrophic</strong> – To someone with low emotional intelligence, failing is a terrifying prospect that stops them in their tracks.</p> <p><strong>7. Constantly interrupting</strong> – People with higher emotional intelligence actively listen and pay attention to body language. Conversely, people with low E.Q. interrupt often and struggle to correctly interpret meaning.</p> <p><strong>8. Accentuate the negative</strong> – Find fault with others easily; focus on negative aspects.</p> <p><strong>9. “Silly emotions”</strong> – Often aware of emotional shortcomings, these people will downplay the importance of emotion, or trivialise others’ feelings.</p> <p><strong>10. No empathy</strong> – The ability to empathise and sympathise reflects a high level of emotional intelligence. The inability to do these things often reflects the opposite.</p> <p>Do you recognise any of these traits in yourself, or perhaps in someone you love?</p>

Mind

Placeholder Content Image

This common quirk is a sign of intelligence

<p>A couple of months ago, <a href="http://www.oversixty.com.au/health/mind/2017/05/personality-trait-indicates-intelligence/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">we learnt</span></strong></a> that people who talk to themselves could in fact be smarter than those who don’t. Now, researchers have taken it a step further, discovering that talking to pets is also a sign of intelligence.</p> <p>According to Nicholas Epley, professor of behavioural science at the University of Chicago and author of <em>Mindwise: How We Understand What Others Think, Believe, Feel and Want</em>, believes that talking to pets, plants and other non-human things is what makes humans so unique – and so smart.</p> <p>“Historically, anthropomorphising has been treated as a sign of childishness or stupidity, but it’s actually a natural by-product of the tendency that makes humans uniquely smart on this planet,” he tells <a href="https://qz.com/935832/why-do-people-name-their-plants-cars-ships-and-guitars-anthropomorphism-may-actually-signal-social-intelligence/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Quartz</span></strong></a>. “No other species that has this tendency.”</p> <p>It’s the reason why we name our cars, assign human emotions to our animal friends, describe the weather as “threatening” or “angry”. It’s simply a symptom of active, smart and social brains.</p> <p>And it’s not a new phenomenon, either. According to Ingrid Piller, professor of linguistics at Macquarie University, anthropomorphisation has been going on for more than a thousand years. “If you’re a legendary knight, you trust and defend your life through your weapon, and if you’re on a ship a few hundred years ago, your life is at the mercy of the vessel,” she explains. “You name the vessel because it becomes your most important companion. You want to believe it has vested interest in keeping you safe – even though it truly has no interests at all.”</p> <p>This same mental framework also explains why we see faces <em>everywhere</em> – in the sky, in our food… heck, some people even <a href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/arielknutson/people-who-found-jesus-in-their-food?utm_term=.aq1gLQWYRK#.ink5vJOVWm" target="_blank"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">swear they’ve seen Jesus</span></strong></a> in a potato chip, slice of toast and a banana.</p> <p>So rest easy – if you’re seeing faces and talking to inanimate objects, you’re not going crazy. Sure, you’ll get a few strange looks, but you can rest easy in the fact that your “weird” quirks are completely normal and part of what make you who you are.</p> <p>Tell us in the comments below, do you talk to pets, plants and other items around your house?</p>

Mind

Placeholder Content Image

4 signs you have high emotional intelligence

<p><em><strong>Jose M. Mestre is a Professor of Emotion and Motivation at the University of Cadiz. Kimberly A. Barchard is an Associate Professor in Quantitative Psychology at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.</strong></em></p> <p>Emotional intelligence can mean the difference between behaving in a socially acceptable way and being considered to be way out of line. While most people will have heard of emotional intelligence, not many people really know how to spot it – in themselves or in others.</p> <p>Emotional intelligence is essentially the way you perceive, understand, express, and manage emotions. And it’s important because the more you understand these aspects of yourself, the better your mental health and social behaviour will be.</p> <p>It might be these are things you do without even really thinking – which can be the case for a lot of people. Or it might be that these are skills you know you need to work on.</p> <p>Either way, improved emotional intelligence can be very useful in all sorts of circumstances – be it in work, at home, in school, or even when you’re just socialising with your friends.</p> <p>So if you want to know if you’re emotionally intelligent, simply check the list below.</p> <p><strong>1. You think about your reactions</strong></p> <p>Emotional intelligence can mean the difference between a good reaction and a bad reaction to circumstances. Emotions can contain important information that can be useful to personal and social functioning – but sometimes these emotions can also overwhelm us, and make us act in ways we would rather not.</p> <p>People who lack emotional intelligence are more likely to just react, without giving themselves the time to weigh up the pros and cons of a situation and really thinking things through.</p> <p>People who are less able to regulate their negative feelings are also more likely to have difficulty functioning socially – which can exacerbate depressive feelings.</p> <p>People with <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="https://www.helpguide.org/articles/depression/depression-signs-and-symptoms.htm">major depression</a> </strong></span>have been shown to have <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1754073916650494" target="_blank">difficulties</a></strong></span> understanding and managing their emotions. And research has also shown that more depressive symptoms are present in people with lower emotional intelligence – even if they are not clinically depressed.</p> <p><strong>2. You see situations as a challenge</strong></p> <p>If you are able to recognise negative emotions in yourself and see difficult <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1754073916650497" target="_blank">situations as a challenge</a></strong></span> – focusing on the positives and persevering – chances are that you’ve got high emotional intelligence.</p> <p>Imagine for a moment you lost your job. An emotionally intelligent person might perceive their emotions as cues to take action, both to deal with the challenges and to control their thoughts and feelings.</p> <p>But someone with poor emotional skills might <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.apa.org/monitor/nov05/cycle.aspx" target="_blank">ruminate</a></strong></span> on their job loss, come to think of themselves as hopelessly unemployable, and spiral into depression.</p> <p><strong>3. You can modify your emotions</strong></p> <p>Of course, there are times when your feelings can get the better of you, but if you are an emotionally intelligent person, it is likely that when this happens you have the skills needed to modify your emotions.</p> <p>For example, while average levels of anxiety can improve cognitive performance – probably by increasing focus and motivation – too much anxiety can block cognitive achievement.</p> <p>So knowing how to find the sweet spot, between too much and too little anxiety, can be a useful tool.</p> <p>It is clear that <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-brain-and-emotional-intelligence/201203/the-sweet-spot-achievement">moderation</a> </strong></span>is the key when it comes to managing our emotions. Emotionally intelligent people know this and have the skills to modify their emotions appropriately.</p> <p>And this is probably why emotional intelligence has been shown to be <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://emotional.intelligence.uma.es/documentos/pdf60among_adolescents.pdf" target="_blank">related</a></strong></span> to lower levels of anxiety.</p> <p><strong>4. You can put yourself in other people’s shoes</strong></p> <p>If you are able to extend these skills beyond your own personal functioning, then that’s another sign that you have high levels of emotional intelligence.</p> <p>Emotional intelligence can be particularly important in workplaces that require heavy “<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="https://hbr.org/2016/09/managing-the-hidden-stress-of-emotional-labor" target="_blank">emotional labour</a></strong></span>” – where workers must manage their emotions according to organisational rules.</p> <p>This can include customer service jobs, where workers may need to sympathise with customers – despite the fact that customers may be yelling at them.</p> <p>This is why workplace emotional intelligence training is now common – with the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1754073916650496" target="_blank">most effective training</a></strong></span> focusing on management and expression of emotions, which are directly linked to communication and job performance.</p> <p>It’s also worth pointing out that emotional intelligence is a cognitive ability that can improve across your <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.livescience.com/37134-emotional-intelligence-improve-aging.html" target="_blank">lifespan</a></strong></span>. So if you haven’t recognised much of yourself in the traits listed above, fear not, there’s still time for you to work on your emotional intelligence.</p> <p><em>Written by Jose M. Mestre and Kimberly A. Barchard. First appeared on <a href="https://theconversation.com/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Conversation</span></strong></a>.<img width="1" height="1" src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/71165/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation"/> </em></p>

Body