Placeholder Content Image

Eight key questions about lab-grown meat

<div class="copy"> <p>It’s been around for a decade now — but <a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/podcast/lab-grown-meat/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cultured meat</a> still faces some huge hurdles.</p> <p>On 5 August, it will be ten years since the world was introduced to <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-23576143" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the first lab-grown burger</a>.</p> <p>A decade after its arrival, biotechnologist Professor Paul Wood answers eight key questions about cultured meat.</p> <h2>What is lab-grown meat?</h2> <p>Cultured meat, also colloquially referred to as lab-grown meat, is <a href="https://academic.oup.com/af/article/13/2/68/7123477" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the concept</a> of taking a biopsy from a living animal, selecting an individual cell type and growing these cells in large scale <a href="https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/ajpcell.00408.2022" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">bioreactors</a>.</p> <p>Technically, it’s a viable alternative to growing an animal to maturity before harvesting meat from its carcass.</p> <p>Multiple cell types can be used from animals, such as muscle, fat or <a href="https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Fibroblast" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">fibroblasts</a>.</p> <p>The initial stage of cell selection requires the <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123745538002537" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">creation of a cell line</a> which will grow continuously in a selective culture medium.</p> <h2>How long has it been around?</h2> <p>The technology for the culture of cells in laboratories has been used for many decades to produce drugs like <a href="https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/types/immunotherapy/monoclonal-antibodies" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">monoclonal antibodies</a> or <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161866/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">viral vaccines</a>.</p> <p>The difference with cultured meat is the cells themselves are used to produce edible products rather than used as production systems for monoclonals or viral antigens.</p> <p>Cultured meat was first introduced back in 2013 with <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-23576143" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the unveiling of the world’s first lab-grown burger</a>, which cost a whopping USD$330,000 to produce.</p> <p>The first commercial cultured meat product was <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/business-55155741" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a chicken nugget licensed in Singapore</a> in 2020.</p> <p><a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/lab-grown-meat-approved-for-sale-what-you-need-to-know/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">In June 2023</a>, the US Department of Agriculture granted two companies — Upside Foods and Good Meat — licences to sell chicken-based products.</p> <p>Significant excitement ensued in the food industry with <a href="https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ind.2021.29240.ctu?journalCode=ind" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">predictions</a> that cultured meat will transform the meat industry by 2030.</p> <h2>Is lab-grown meat commercially viable?</h2> <p>Currently <a href="https://gfi.org/resource/cultivated-meat-eggs-and-dairy-state-of-the-industry-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">around USD$3 billion</a> has been invested in over 150 companies working on beef, chicken, pork, lamb and exotic cell-based products. <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2023/03/woolly-mammoth-meatball-stunt-food-marketing/673578/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Woolly mammoth meatball</a> anyone?</p> <p>Upside Foods has launched its <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/01/business/lab-grown-chicken-san-francisco/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">new cell-based chicken product in a Michelin star restaurant</a>, but it is only available one night a month and the price has not been disclosed.</p> <p>Commercial success will require significant scaling in production, <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bit.27848" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cost reductions</a> and consumer acceptance, or these products will be confined to niche markets for wealthy consumers.</p> <p>Cultured meat is unlikely to be the solution for the <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/6/7/53" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">increasing protein needs of developing nations</a>.</p> <p>The <a href="https://academic.oup.com/af/article/13/2/68/7123477" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">technical challenges</a> involve scaling up cell growth in over 10,000 litre fermentation vessels, while significantly reducing the cost of cell-culture media, the capital cost of equipment and the operating cost of high-quality sterile biocontainment facilities.</p> <p>It has been estimated that the cost of production of cultured meat <a href="https://cedelft.eu/publications/tea-of-cultivated-meat/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">must be reduced by over 1,000-fold</a> to match that of conventional meat production.</p> <p>Proponents of cultured meat like to quote the concept of <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/moores-law" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Moore’s law</a> that predicts that the cost of all new technology will be significantly reduced with time. However this law has never been applied to a biological system that has innate growth limits.</p> <h2>Is it good for you — and does it taste okay?</h2> <p>Currently <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-20061-y" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">all cultured meats are hybrid or blended products</a>, in which the harvested cell paste — the meat component — is combined with plant-based materials, plus vitamins and minerals to produce burgers, meatballs, sausages and dumplings.</p> <p>Yes, you have to add the vitamins in, and no, you can’t make a steak with it yet.</p> <p>From a commercial perspective this is important, as cultured meat products will compete in the commodity meat market.</p> <p>Cultured meat does not produce a three-dimensional steak with multiple cell types and complex taste and texture.</p> <p>However, <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanabandoim/2021/02/12/worlds-first-3d-bioprinted-and-cultivated-ribeye-steak-is-revealed/?sh=4b6baf0a4781" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">there are companies</a> aiming to develop whole cuts of meat using 3D printing and bioengineering technology.</p> <h2>What is the motivation to produce cell-cultured meat?</h2> <p>The drivers for cultured meat are that <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2018-05-06/vegan-alternative-plant-based-meat-grown-in-lab/9726436" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">animals are not slaughtered</a>, there can be less land and water usage and less greenhouse gases are produced than conventional meat production, particularly from ruminants like cattle and sheep.</p> <p>A lower manufacturing footprint is a terrific plus. And not killing animals is something a lot of people advocate for, but until cultured meat has been scaled significantly, it won’t be known if it’s really better for the planet or for humans.</p> <p>The <a href="https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2022/04/21/cultivated-meat-upside-foods-closes-400m-series-c-round-to-support-commercial-scale-plant-with-production-capacity-of-tens-of-millions-of-pounds" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">largest facility built so far</a> is a pilot plant in the USA that aims to produce around 1,000 pounds (approximately 450 kilograms) of product per week, which is equivalent to the dressed weight of three carcasses — what a single suburban butcher processes in one day.</p> <h2>Will it be expensive to buy?</h2> <p>The taste and texture of food is critical to consumers — but so is value for money. So, it’s not surprising <a href="https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/mapped-meat-consumption-by-country-and-type/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">chicken is the dominant choice of meat</a> currently.</p> <p>With high-end lab-grown meat products, both taste and texture can most likely be matched, and with supplementation with vitamins like B12 it should be possible to make cultured meat nutritionally equivalent to its traditional counterpart too.</p> <p>However, cost will be a major challenge and sales data indicated that <a href="https://www.freshplaza.com/oceania/article/9535792/consumers-are-not-willing-to-pay-more-for-sustainability/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">consumers will not pay any significant premium for slaughter-free or more sustainable products</a>.</p> <h2>Who wants to eat meat grown in a factory?</h2> <p>There are also questions around who the consumers will be for cultured meat.</p> <p>Vegans avoid animal products, vegetarians often reject the taste of meat and this new group of <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924224421003952" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">flexitarians</a>, while interested in trying new products, are seldom converted to <a href="https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2021/11/16/What-do-flexitarian-consumers-want-Plant-based-innovation-opportunities-revealed" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">regular customers</a>.</p> <p>In the US at least, this is one of the reasons that the many plant-based meat products have only captured <a href="https://gfi.org/marketresearch/#plant-based-meat" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1.3 percent of the meat market</a>.</p> <p>It is also likely that plant-based products will be a <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/agriculture/our-insights/alternative-proteins-the-race-for-market-share-is-on" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">major competitor</a> to these new cultured meat products.</p> <h2>Who will be next to approve cell-cultured meat?</h2> <p>While the first cultured meat products have been licensed in Singapore and the US, it is expected more will follow from other regions.</p> <p>Even though <a href="https://www.fao.org/food-safety/scientific-advice/crosscutting-and-emerging-issues/cell-based-food/en/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a recent FAO report</a> identified over 50 potential health risks with cultured meat, it concluded that the overall risk was not greater than that seen with conventional meat products.</p> <p>There could be delays in Europe due to the conservative regulatory approach taken in the EU. In Australia, products are <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2023-06-27/cultured-lab-meat-to-sell-in-australia-to-rival-plant-based-meat/102527330" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">expected to be approved in 2024</a>.</p> <p>For now though? Well, the message to Aussie meat producers is … don’t sell the farm.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p> </div> <div id="contributors"> <p><em><a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/health/nutrition/explainer-lab-grown-meat/">This article</a> was originally published on <a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com">Cosmos Magazine</a> and was written by <a href="null">Cosmos</a>. </em></p> </div>

Food & Wine

Placeholder Content Image

Chinese defector has new theory on COVID origins

<p>A Chinese defector has suggested the COVID-19 pandemic began after the virus was potentially leaked amongst participants of the military games in Wuhan in October 2019, months before the deadly outbreak was confirmed by China.</p> <p>Defector and democracy campaigner Wei Jingsheng was speaking with Sky News journalist Sharri Markson for her new book <em>What Really Happened in Wuhan</em>.</p> <p>He said thousands of athletes from around the world came to Wuhan for the Military World Games in October and this was likely the first superspreader event.</p> <p>Jingsheng said: “I thought that the Chinese government would take this opportunity to spread the virus during the Military Games, as many foreigners would show up there,” he said.</p> <p>He claims he was aware of Chinese authorities experimenting with "strange biological weapons", a tip off from a government source, and tried to warn the US but was unsuccessful.</p> <p><strong>Many athletes from different countries reported sickness</strong></p> <p><img style="width: 0px; height: 0px;" src="/nothing.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/8fddf3839bed4bb6be443112db24b245" /><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.2971342383107px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7844291/wei-military-games-um.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/8fddf3839bed4bb6be443112db24b245" /></p> <p>Multiple athletes from around the world later reported sickness and symptoms consistent with COVID-19.</p> <p>Last month the US's Republican Foreign Affairs Committee released a report claiming Beijing was rushing to cover up the virus's spread around the time of the military games.</p> <p>Republican Representative Michael McCaul said: "When they realised what happened, Chinese Communist Party officials and scientists at the WIV began frantically covering up the leak.”</p> <p>"But their coverup was too late — the virus was already spreading throughout the megacity of Wuhan," he added.</p> <p><img style="width: 0px; height: 0px;" src="/nothing.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/4f8f86d22ea94363be718fe6352928ca" /><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.1804008908686px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7844293/wei-jingshang-lab-um.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/4f8f86d22ea94363be718fe6352928ca" /></p> <p><strong>China suggests other countries are responsible for COVID</strong></p> <p>China has pointed to overseas, including Italy, France and the US, where it says the virus was detected long before it reported its first official cases in December 2019 but Jingsheng’s theory provides an explanation for such cases.</p> <p>The Communist Party of China has become angry over what it claims is a concerted effort from the West to smear China when it comes to the investigation of the origins of COVID.</p> <p>Beijing has suggested it was the US who imported the virus to Wuhan during the military games, calling for investigations into its Fort Detrick facility.</p> <p><strong>Former US president Donald Trump suggest the evidence points to a lab leak</strong></p> <p><img style="width: 0px; height: 0px;" src="/nothing.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/687e3da31a264cff9642b3b46f5b8426" /><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.2018489984592px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7844292/wei-trump-um.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/687e3da31a264cff9642b3b46f5b8426" /></p> <p>Former US president Donald Trump also spoke with Markson for her book and he claimed it’s “obvious” the virus had been leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.</p> <p>Trump made a point of saying he didn’t think the virus was “intentionally” spread but that it escaped via an accidental leak.</p> <p>“I don’t know if they had bad thoughts or whether it was gross incompetence, but one way or the other, it came out of Wuhan, and it came from the Wuhan lab,” Trump said.</p> <p>Trump added one indication was the early emergence of stories filtering into his office about body bags being piled up outside the lab.</p> <p>Former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo also talked with Markson and he said there was “enormous, albeit indirect, evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the centrepoint for this.”</p> <p>“The cumulative evidence that one can see points singularly to the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” he said.</p> <p>Pompeo added the US has intelligence three scientists at the lab fell ill two months before the first cases of COVID were officially reported in December 2019.</p> <p>Former US director of national intelligence John Ratcliffe says these scientists are now missing.</p> <p>Another claim that was delivered to Trump was that a lab worker left for lunch and met his girlfriend, infecting her with the virus.</p> <p><strong>WHO chief calls for more investigation of the lab leak theory</strong></p> <p>Initially criticised for his soft approach with China, World Health Organisation (WHO) chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus surprisingly questioned the findings of a joint mission into the origins of COVID earlier this year, calling for more to be done to investigate the lab leak theory.</p> <p><em>Image: Getty Images and Sky News</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

Chance of COVID emerging naturally is “one in a million”

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As COVID-19 vaccinations continue to be administered and the number of coronavirus cases remains low in Australia (or New Zealand), scientists are looking to answer one remaining question: where did the virus come from?</span></p> <p><strong>The lab leak theory</strong></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr Steven Quay, the chief executive of biopharmaceutical company Atossa Technologies and former faculty member at Stanford University’s School of Medicine, said the probability of SARS-CoV-2 emerging naturally was “literally one in a million”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Presenting at a conference organised by the Hudson Institute in Washington DC alongside astrophysicist Professor Richard Muller, the pair accused Chinese scientists of concealing the origins as a manufactured virus.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The increased interest in the origin of the virus comes after the US government ordered its intelligence agencies to investigate the origins of COVID-19.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr Quay said the </span><a href="https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-convened-global-study-of-origins-of-sars-cov-2-china-part"><span style="font-weight: 400;">report conducted by the World Health Organisation</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, tabled in March, had “censored” the earliest cases of COVID-19 outside of the Wuhan wet market.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“This is not science, this is obfuscation,” he added.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Professor Muller said there were concerns scientists who pursued the “lab leak” theory would be “blacklisted and labelled an enemy of China”.</span></p> <p><strong>An alternative theory</strong></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Others theorise that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had been performing “gain of function” experiments - where a virus is manipulated to make it more infectious.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This kind of research has been conducted at labs around the world, according to Professor Dwyer.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The institute haven’t published anything significant on gain-of-function studies. I’m not an expert in that area, but my understanding is they weren’t doing gain-of-function work that has been obviously traceable.”</span></p> <p><strong>Flaws in the theory</strong></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Though some have labelled the WHO report as inconclusive, the 17 international experts who produced the report concluded the most likely origin of the pandemic came from the virus jumping between species - possibly from bats to pangolins - and then to humans.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Professor Dwyer, director of public health pathology in NSW and one of the experts who contributed to the report, said the key flaw in the lab leak theory was there was no evidence the Wuhan Institute of Virology had the virus before the pandemic.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The laboratory leak, for that to be the origin … meant they must have had the virus to begin with, and we don’t have evidence of that,” he said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The lab leak sits there, but you need some sort of evidence to take it further.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The institute had been working to find and publish papers on new bat coronaviruses, including a virus that is the closest known match to COVID-19 so far, and Professor Dwyer said it was unlikely the institute would have had SARS-CoV-2 and not published anything about it.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“They are a pretty prominent research institute. They publish a lot of very good papers and have collaborations with people around the world. If they had it, there was no reason to hide it from a scientific or intellectual point of view.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Additionally, some have argued that the lack of an identified intermediate host for the coronavirus supports the lab leak theory, with science journalist Nicholas Wade claiming the SARS intermediate was found within four months of that outbreak.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But, Professor Dwyer said it actually took 15 years to find the animal source of SARS.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“These things can take time,” he said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We felt transmission from bat to some sort of intermediate animal to humans was the most likely because it has occurred before - and not just once before, but several times.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Based on history, based on things like what markets are like in Wuhan and other neighbouring countries … that seems to be the most likely scenario for it to develop.”</span></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Chinese whistleblower claims she has proof COVID-19 came from Wuhan lab

<p>A Chinese virologist has made claims that COVID-19 was manufactured in a laboratory and did not come from “nature” like the Chinese government is claiming.</p> <p>Doctor Li-Meng Yan, a scientist who conducted some of the earliest research on COVID-19, joined the British talk show <em>Loose Women </em>to share her claims.</p> <p>She says that reports the virus came from a wet market are a “smokescreen”.</p> <p>“It comes from the lab, the lab in Wuhan and the lab is controlled by China’s government,” she said.</p> <p>She says her source are “local doctors”.</p> <p>“The first thing is the market in Wuhan ... is a smokescreen.</p> <p>“This virus is not from nature.”</p> <p>Yan earlier claimed she was told to keep a secret about the possibility of human-to-human transmission of COVID-19 back in December.</p> <p>She went on to say that former supervisors at the Hong Kong School of Public Health silenced her when she tried to sound the alarm.</p> <p>She fled Hong Kong for America in April.</p> <p>Dr Yan’s next plan is to release genomic sequencing that she says will trace the virus back to a lab.</p> <p>“The genome sequence is like a human fingerprint,” she said.</p> <p>“So based on this you can identify these things. I use the evidence … to tell people why this has come from the lab in China, why they are the only ones who made it.”</p> <p>China has repeatedly said that COVID-19 may not have originated in Asia at all.</p> <p>In July, the country pointed its finger at Spain, claiming that wastewater testing there found traces of the virus in March 2019.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

“We’ll hold those responsible accountable”: US claims virus came from Wuhan lab

<p>The US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has claimed there was “enormous evidence” the new coronavirus originated in a Chinese laboratory, but did not provide any of the alleged evidence.</p> <p>Pompeo, a former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, said on Sunday there was “enormous” and “significant” evidence that the coronavirus outbreak began in a laboratory in Wuhan, China.</p> <p>“I think the whole world can see now, remember, China has a history of infecting the world and running substandard laboratories,” Pompeo told ABC’s <em>This Week</em>.</p> <p>“President Trump is very clear: we’ll hold those responsible accountable.”</p> <p>At first, Pompeo said he believed “the best experts so far seem to think it was man-made”.</p> <p>But he later said he agreed with the “wide scientific consensus” from the US intelligence community that “the COVID-19 virus was not man-made or genetically modified”.</p> <p>Pompeo’s statement indicated an escalation in rhetoric amid the country’s tensions with China.</p> <p>US President Donald Trump made a similar unsupported claim on Thursday, saying that <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/30/donald-trump-coronavirus-chinese-lab-claim">he had proof the pandemic started in a Chinese laboratory</a>.</p> <p>On the same day, Pompeo said in an interview: “We don’t know if it came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. We don’t know if it emanated from the wet market or yet some other place. We don’t know those answers.”</p> <p>Most epidemiologists believe the virus was likely introduced from bats to humans through an intermediary animal.</p> <p>The US had confirmed more than 1.15 million coronavirus cases and 67,000 deaths as of Monday, according to Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Centre.</p> <p>Trump has faced widespread criticism for having overseen a “<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/14/us/politics/coronavirus-trump-who-funding.html">slow and ineffective</a>“ response to the pandemic as states and cities continue to appeal for more federal help in <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/5/3/21245815/larry-kudlow-cnn-jake-tapper-state-of-the-union-coronavirus-stimulus">increasing testing capacity and propping up the economy</a>.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Banana Boat disgrace as 50+ sunscreens fail new lab tests

<p><span>A new lab test has found that seven Banana Boat sunscreens have failed to meet the advertised SPF 50+ claims.</span></p> <p><span>The tests were conducted by Eurofins Dermatest according to international standards and each sunscreen spray was tested 10 times. The results of the tests could lead to a potential filing of a class action lawsuit by an Australian mother and her five children.</span></p> <p><span>Bannister Law is taking registrations against Edgewell Personal Care Australia, the manufacturer of Banana Boat, after laboratory tests found its sunscreen sprays average ratings were SPF20 or less instead of the advertised SPF50+.</span></p> <p><span>"All seven aerosol varieties we tested fell well short of the marketed SPF 50+," said Charles Bannister, founder and principle of Bannister Law.</span></p> <p><span>"To claim SPF 50+, products need to test greater that 60+."</span></p> <p><span>The best performing sunscreen, Banana Boat Kids Clear Sunscreen Spray SPF 50+, achieved an average SPF rating of 20.2. The worst performing sunscreen, Banana Boat SunComfort Clear Sunscreen Spray SPF 50+, achieved an SPF rating of 10.7</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span><img width="500" height="274" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7264633/1_500x274.jpg" alt="1 (47)"/><br /></span></p> <p><span>Leading the class action is a mother and her five children who claim to have been repeatedly burned despite using Banana Boat products, Ultra Clear Sunscreen Spray SPF 50+ and Kids Clear Sunscreen Spray SPF 50+.</span></p> <p><span>All of her five children are believed to be under the age of 10.</span></p> <p><span>Edgewell Personal Care rejected the test results and described them as “anomalous”.</span></p> <p><span>"All Banana Boat products meet the SPF claim as labelled on the pack," a company spokesperson tells CHOICE.</span></p> <p><span>"These results are entirely inconsistent with the testing we have conducted at Edgewell's reputable labs, in accordance with the Australian mandatory standard as regulated by the TGA."</span></p> <p><span>The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the Department of Health body responsible for regulating sunscreens, said in May they started investigating aerosol sunscreen following public concerns.</span></p> <p><span>"TGA undertook preliminary testing to investigate their delivery rates," a spokesperson tells us. "We found the amount of sunscreen delivered per second differed between brands.</span></p> <p><span>"It is important consumers ... 'apply liberally' to ensure proper coverage of the sunscreen."</span></p> <p><span>The class action lawsuit is in early stages, but Charles Bannister said it will most likely go ahead.</span></p> <p><span>"I don't see any reason why this class action won't proceed," he told CHOICE. "I would encourage the makers of Banana Boat to resolve any issues."</span></p> <p><span>Sunscreen SPF claims and regulation were called into question last summer as photos of people who were burned despite applying sunscreen went viral.</span></p> <p><span>Since 2015, the category has come under scrutiny after a CHOICE investigation found four out of six sunscreens did not meet advertised SPF 50+ claims. </span></p> <p><span>Do you own or have you used any of these Banana Boat products and still suffered from sunburn? Tell us in the comments below. </span></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Scientists grow “healthy” meat in labs

<p>Scientists and businesses working full steam to produce lab-created meat claim it will be healthier than conventional meat and more environmentally friendly. But how much can they improve on old-school pork or beef?</p> <p>In August 2013, a team of Dutch scientists showed off their lab-grown burger and even provided a taste test. Two months ago, the American company Memphis Meats fried the first-ever lab meatball. Those who have tasted these items say they barely differ from the real deal.</p> <p>The Dutch and the Americans claim that within a few years’ lab-produced meats will start appearing in supermarkets and restaurants. And these are not the only teams working on cultured meat (as they prefer to call it). Another company, Modern Meadow, promises that lab-grown "steak chips" – something between a potato chip and beef jerky – will hit the stores in the near future, too.<br /> <br /> For some people there's an ick factor to the idea of lab-grown meat, but its backers say that cultured meat may help alleviate the environmental and health challenges posed by the world's growing appetite for conventional meats. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development estimates that the demand for meat in North America will increase by eight per cent between 2011 and 2020, in Europe by seven per cent and in Asia by 56 per cent.</p> <p>Meanwhile, a 2011 study calculated that growing meat in labs would cut down on the land required to produce steaks, sausages and bacon by 99 per cent and reduce the associated need for water by 90 per cent. What's more, it found that a pound of lab-created meat would produce much less polluting greenhouse-gas emissions than is produced by cows and pigs, even poultry.</p> <p>Yet a 2015 life-cycle analysis of potential cultured meat production in the United States painted a less rosy picture if one includes the generation of electricity and heat required to grow the cells in a lab.</p> <p>"It's really too soon to say what the environmental impacts of the first cultured meat products will be," says the lead author of that analysis, Carolyn Mattick, an environmental engineer at Arizona State University. "However, new technologies often come with trade-offs. Take automobiles, for example. They provided huge advantages over horses in the early 1900s, but all of the cars on the road today cumulatively emit a lot of carbon dioxide. That is not to say we should give up our cars or stop researching cultured meat, but rather that we should be prepared to manage the downsides."</p> <p>Yet Mark Post, the Dutch scientist behind the 2013 cultured hamburger, believes the energy demands could be quite easily reduced. "One of the big energy expenditures is cleaning the tanks with heat, but simple soap might be very, very efficient," he says.</p> <p>The health benefits of cultured meats are still not completely clear, either.</p> <p>In some aspects, researchers say, lab-grown meat might be better for us. Because cultured meats would be produced in sterile environments, they would be free of such dangerous bacteria. The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that pathogens in conventional meat are the most common sources of fatal food-related infections.</p> <p>The final verdict is still a few years off. "We're not there yet," acknowledges Uma Valeti, a co-founder and the chief executive officer of Memphis Meats, "but in just a few years, we expect to be selling protein-packed pork, beef and chicken that tastes identical to conventionally raised meat but that is cleaner, safer and all-around better than meat from animals grown on farms."</p> <p>At that point we'll be able to decide if it also tastes good.</p> <p><em>Written by Marta Zaraska, first appeared on <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://Stuff.co.nz" target="_blank">Stuff.co.nz</a>.</span></strong></em></p> <p><strong>Related links:</strong></p> <p><a href="/health/body/2016/04/should-we-really-eat-red-meat/" target="_blank"><em><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Should we really be eating red meat?</span></strong></em></a></p> <p><a href="/health/body/2016/02/pros-and-cons-of-going-vegan/"><em><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The pros and cons of a vegan diet</span></strong></em></a></p> <p><a href="/lifestyle/food-wine/2016/02/vegetarian-meat-balls/" target="_blank"><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Vegetarian meat balls</span></em></strong></a></p>

Body