Placeholder Content Image

The festive foliage on the ‘naughty list’ this Christmas

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A team of British researchers have put together a guide of the potential dangers associated with popular Christmas plants.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The “unsystematic review”, published in the Christmas issue of </span><em><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj-2021-066995" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The BMJ</span></a></em><span style="font-weight: 400;">, saw the team immerse themselves in Christmas culture and conduct informal interviews with friends and colleagues to identify plants associated with the festive season, which they then examined against a database of toxic plants.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">After conducting additional investigations, the team classified plants as low, moderate, or high risk, depending on whether they could be eaten.</span></p> <p><strong>Low risk</strong></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Luckily for traditionalists, the iconic Christmas tree is considered safe to be around. The only hazards have been from a few cases of contact dermatitis from workers who had unusually high exposure to the plant.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ivy is also quite safe, with no recorded cases of people being poisoned by them, and winter plants such as poinsettia and Christmas cactus make the list too.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Even the plants featured on the Christmas dinner table have been investigated, with potatoes found to be safe as well.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Brussels sprouts, sadly, are also safe to eat. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Looks like you’ll have to endure them after all,” the authors </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.scimex.org/newsfeed/what-of-your-festive-foliage-should-be-on-the-naughty-list" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: 400;">said</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p> <p><img style="width: 305.5878928987195px; height: 500px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7846437/xmas-plants.png" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/00426e9ef6754246afc9662b6697d606" /></p> <p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Image: The British Medical Journal. DOI: </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-066995" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: 400;">10.1136/bmj-2021-066995</span></a></em></p> <p><strong>Moderate risk</strong></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As for plants that require a bit more caution, the authors identified holly - with its berries that can cause stomach upset and drowsiness if eaten in large amounts - as well as rosemary - with reports that a twig perforated a person’s bowel.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The authors sounded a note of caution for cinnamon and nutmeg, often found in mulled wine, and discouraged people from taking up the cinnamon challenge (a viral challenge to eat a spoonful of ground cinnamon in under a minute without drinking anything). Nutmeg was noted for causing hallucinations in “remarkably low doses” (less than a tablespoon).</span></p> <p><strong>High risk</strong></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Surprisingly, both Christmas wreaths and mistletoe made the team’s high-risk list, meaning that caution around them is advised and they shouldn’t be eaten.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mistletoe contains poisonous proteins called viscoproteins, which can lead to the destruction of cells, and eating it can cause gastrointestinal upset.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As for Christmas wreaths, those made with bittersweet (a member of the Nightshade family) and yew can cause abdominal cramps or cardiac dysrhythmia if eaten.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In summary, the team recommends taking sensible precautions while handling or consuming plants, both at Christmas time and throughout the year.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We hope that this piece has given you the information necessary to navigate holiday foliage more safely,” they conclude.</span></p> <p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Image: Getty Images</span></em></p>

Home & Garden

Placeholder Content Image

The "naughty" birthday card Princess Diana sent to her accountant

<p>An inside look into Princess Diana’s sense of humour has been revealed after a birthday card she sent to her accountant has been put up for auction.</p> <p>Assumed to be from the '90s, the cheeky card, which includes a handwritten note from the late royal is featured on LA-based celebrity auction site Julien’s Auctions after its owner, who wishes to remain anonymous, decided to part ways with the valuable item.</p> <p>The seller believes that the card was sent by Diana – who passed away in 1997 after a tragic car crash in Paris – to her accountant and close friend Anthony Burrage.</p> <p><img style="width: 0px; height: 0px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7821813/4_thp_chp_031118slug_1786jpg.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/f84db9a247cb42f39817134c4293706c" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><em>Photo: Julien's Auctions</em></p> <p>The card shows an illustrated Sleeping Beauty and includes a witty anecdote that says: “A little prick in the hand sent Sleeping Beauty to sleep”.</p> <p><img style="width: 0px; height: 0px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7821812/2_thp_chp_031118slug_1787jpg.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/fcf845e11fcd4c0080af0a8dd29cbcdd" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><em>Photo: Julien's Auctions</em></p> <p>And while it may seem innocuous, as on first glance it seems to be referring to the classic fairytale where Sleeping Beauty pricks her finger on a spinning wheel, the cheeky humour is revealed once the card is opened. Inside the card the punchline reads: “Only the big ones are worth staying awake for!”</p> <p>The message written by the Princess says: “A belated Happy Birthday for the 5th! From Diana.”</p> <p>Bidding for the card is currently standing at $250 but the price is expected to increase each day and go up to $800-$1200.</p> <p>The bidding site has described the card as: “A humorous birthday card with ‘Sleeping Beauty’ on the cover, handwritten in black felt pen by HRH Princess Diana: ‘Tony, A belated Happy Birthday for the 5th, from, Diana.’ Tony refers to Anthony Burrage, accountant and trusted employee of HRH Princess Diana.”</p> <p>The owner of the prized possession recently spoke to <em><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/princess-diana-sent-friend-cheeky-13527095" target="_blank">The Mirror</a> </em>and said: “I know that Diana liked to send humorous cards, but I haven’t seen any quite this naughty, so for me it really shows that she was a fun human being that could share some dirty jokes with her closest friends."</p> <p>They added, “This is a secret card that has been kept hidden for many years. A true gem for anyone that is a fan of this special human being.”</p>

Books

Placeholder Content Image

Mum threatens to cancel Christmas to punish naughty children

<p>An Australian mother sick of her children misbehaving has made them believe Santa would cancel Christmas unless their behaviour improved.</p> <p>The three children found their Christmas tree wrapped in industrial strength cling wrap with a note warning they had just one week to shape up.</p> <p><img width="419" height="558" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/12/05/12/470130DC00000578-5147489-A_Queensland_mother_sick_of_her_children_misbehaving_wrapped_up_-a-11_1512478383865.jpg" alt="A Queensland mother sick of her children misbehaving wrapped up the tree and made them believe Santa would cancel Christmas unless they improved with one a week" class="blkBorder img-share b-loaded" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" id="i-ce90da0dffbb52bb"/></p> <p>Signed by “Elise”, one of Santa’s elves, the note put the kids on notice.</p> <p>“If you want me to keep visiting, a Santa visit, your tree and presents back your behaviour needs to improve,” the note read.</p> <p>“Santa is very angry and I'm disappointed. Be good and say sorry to mum. You all have 1 week to improve. I'm watching.”</p> <p>The mum’s decision drew a mixed reaction when posted on social media.</p> <p>“As a mother of 5, foster Mum of 2, Granny of 13 and a great grandmother I say well done. It’s great to see a parent in control,” one woman wrote, praising the mother.</p> <p>“Kids of old used to get a lump of coal in their Christmas stocking if they were not up to scratch,” another user commented.</p> <p>“These lucky modern kids got given an opportunity to redeem themselves before the cut-off date. I think us parents are getting soft just like our kids.”</p> <p><img width="432" height="786" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/12/05/12/470130E500000578-5147489-Signed_by_Elise_purportedly_one_of_Santa_s_elves_the_note_put_th-a-12_1512478383973.jpg" alt="Signed by Elise, purportedly one of Santa's elves, the note put the children on notice, telling them her boss was angry with them" class="blkBorder img-share b-loaded" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" id="i-67dc04ee693f04a9"/></p> <p>However, many others condemned the mum’s actions branding it “awful parenting” as the message was too vague for children to know when they did wrong.</p> <p>Others said rather than pretending to be Santa and his elves the mum should have addressed the problems with her children as parents instead.</p> <p>“It's too harsh. We used to just say 'Remember Santa's watching'. No threats, no drama - and it worked a treat in our house,” one wrote. “Our grandkids get the same reminder from their parents now.”</p> <p>“Consequences should always be directly related and immediate. Also it's so vague - what behaviour needs changing? How are you helping your children improve their behaviour?” another parent commented.</p> <p>“Be clear (and realistic) in your expectations and don't forget to model the behaviour you want to see.”</p> <p>What do you think? Let us know in the comments below.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

8 hidden naughty jokes in children’s movies you probably missed

<p>While you and your children were watching these classic kid’s movies, you might have missed some of the seedier jokes the writers put in for adult entertainment only.</p> <p>Be warned: these revelations may change the way you view these once seemingly innocent films and some may not be for the faint of heart.</p> <p><strong>1. Willy Wonka</strong></p> <p>If you’re not one for dirty humour, this one won’t be for you. In the original Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, Willy Wonka exclaims that the “snozzberries taste like snozzberries!”. Well, in a later adult novel, author Roald Dahl revealed that a “snozzberry” is another word for… male parts.</p> <p><strong>2. Madagascar</strong></p> <p>When Marty the zebra is chased by Alex the lion, he yells “Oh, sugar honey iced tea!” which, if you take the first letter of each word, spells “SH*T!” We might use that one in front of the grandkids, actually.</p> <p><strong>3. Toy Story</strong></p> <p>In the first Toy Story, Sid’s deformed toys hang out with a toy made up of a fishing rod and hook and a pair of Barbie’s legs. Legs plus a fishing rod equals a hooker.</p> <p><strong>4. Mrs. Doubtfire</strong></p> <p>In this hilarious movie, the late Robin Williams said, “I should never buy gribenes from a mohel. It’s so chewy.” If your Yiddish is lacking, “gribenes” is a kosher meal made with chicken skin cracklings. “Mohel” is a physician who performs circumcisions. Try to look at this movie the same way now, we dare you.</p> <p><strong>5. Toy Story 3</strong></p> <p>Another one from Toy Story: when a stuffed bear takes Mrs. Potato Head’s lips from her face, Mr. Potato Head yells “Hey, nobody takes my wife’s mouth but me!” If you still don’t get the joke, it’s probably for the best.</p> <p><strong>6. The Emperor’s New Groove</strong></p> <p>Kronk literally “pitches a tent” over his nether regions before bed, making for an amusing adult euphemism that the kids didn’t understand.</p> <p><strong>7. 101 Dalmatians</strong></p> <p>In this movie, Roger and Anita tell Cruella that they’re expecting a baby, and then add that they’re also having puppies. Cruella replies “Well, you have been a busy boy, haven’t you?”. Ick.</p> <p><strong>8. Cars</strong></p> <p>For a split second, this children’s auto-themed movie shows a sign that reads “Top Down Truck Stop: All Convertible Waitresses.” Yes, ladies and gentlemen, that is a joke about nude waitresses.</p> <p><strong>Related links:</strong></p> <p><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="/lifestyle/family/2015/09/disney-princesses-as-seniors/">Disney princesses reimagined as senior women</a></span></em></strong></p> <p><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="/lifestyle/family/2015/09/retro-teenage-posters/">The best retro posters from the past</a></span></em></strong></p> <p><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="/lifestyle/family/2015/08/facts-about-sound-of-music/">6 little known facts about The Sound of Music</a></span></em></strong></p>

Movies

Placeholder Content Image

The 20 names of the naughtiest children

<p>New research has revealed the names of the naughtiest kids – and the most well-behaved children.</p> <p>Stationary website <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.schoolstickers.com/" target="_blank">School Stickers</a></strong></span> looked at the records of more than 59,000 students who use the website’s online reward sticker books. Trawling through the 1.1 million rewards, they compiled this tongue-in-cheek list of the names that received the most reward stickers, and those who received the least.</p> <p>Look, it’s not research that’s gone through a rigorous scientific method, but here’s the list they arrived at for the best and worst-behaved kids.</p> <p>Here are the names of the boys and girls who are the naughtiest ...</p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Girls </span></p> <ul> <li>Ella</li> <li>Bethany</li> <li>Eleanor</li> <li>Olivia</li> <li>Laura</li> <li>Holly</li> <li>Courtney</li> <li>Amber</li> <li>Caitlin</li> <li>Jade</li> </ul> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Boys </span></p> <ul> <li>Joseph</li> <li>Cameron</li> <li>William</li> <li>Jake</li> <li>Joshua</li> <li>Jamie</li> <li>Lewis</li> <li>Benjamin</li> <li>Ethan</li> <li>Luke</li> </ul> <p>And these are the names of the most well-behaved children ...</p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Girls </span></p> <ul> <li>Amy</li> <li>Georgia</li> <li>Emma</li> <li>Charlotte</li> <li>Grace</li> <li>Sophie</li> <li>Abigail</li> <li>Hannah</li> <li>Emily</li> <li>Alice</li> </ul> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Boys</span></p> <ul> <li>Jacob</li> <li>Daniel</li> <li>Thomas</li> <li>James</li> <li>Adam</li> <li>Harry</li> <li>Samuel</li> <li>Jack</li> <li>Oliver</li> <li>Ryan</li> </ul>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Babies know whether you are naughty or nice

<p>Humans appear to have a strong and innate sense of fairness. When somebody cheats other people, breaks the rules or otherwise behaves badly, we instinctively tend to try to avoid dealing with them, psychological research suggests. This tendency is probably an evolutionary adaptation that has allowed cooperative humans to thrive, and it may be a big factor in our incredible success as a species.</p> <p>What's fascinating is that this aversion to dealing with people who are unfair, bad or immoral appears present in very young children, too – even babies. Studies have shown that infants in the first months of life try to avoid dealing with social wrongdoers – for example, sharing less with them and helping them less - and they expect others to, too.</p> <p>But just how strong is this moral aversion, and can it be overcome? In a study recently published in the journal Cognition, researchers set out to answer that question – basically, by bribing babies. The experiment was based on previous research suggesting that one can detect babies' and young children's preferences for people by looking at from whom they choose to accept food or toys. The study looked at whether infants and children could be tempted into dealing with unsavoury people, and just how much it would cost.</p> <p>In the first experiment, the researchers asked 160 kids between 5 and 8 years old to choose whether they wanted to accept stickers from one of two fictitious characters, one of whom would give them one sticker, and the other of whom would give them two, four, eight or 16 stickers instead. Like the rational little animals they are, the children in the study reliably chose the larger offering instead of the smaller one.</p> <p>But then the tests were repeated with an additional twist. The children were told that the character offering them one sticker was nice, whereas the character offering them more stickers was mean and had hit somebody on the playground. Here, in the groups offered two, four or eight stickers, 16 of the 20 children chose to accept the one sticker from the do-gooder instead. Only four of the kids were persuaded to deal with the meanie by the prospect of a larger haul.</p> <p>But there was one group that responded slightly differently: the children who were offered 16 stickers from the bad character, rather than one sticker from the good guy. In this case, the discrepancy was so large that the children tended to choose the larger number.</p> <p>The findings suggest that, when the winnings are modest, children will avoid doing business with a wrongdoer, the researchers say. "However, when the stakes are high, children show more willingness to deal with the devil."</p> <p>Don't we all.</p> <p>The researchers say it's possible that the kids generally chose the good guy because of their desire to please the experimenter. They could have been more concerned with showing the adult in the situation they know the difference between right or wrong than actually making the moral choice.</p> <p>In order to address this issue, the experimenters performed another, similar experiment with a younger group of subjects: babies. From developmental research, we know that children begin to truly understand and be concerned about what other people think about them between 3 and 5 years old. Below those ages, they are too young developmentally to engage in what the researchers call reputational consideration or management.</p> <p>So in another experiment, the researchers asked 80 infants, all of whom were about 1 year old, to participate in another test. (As is the case with tiny people, 16 of those infants were excluded from the final sample because of being fussy or failing to make a choice.)</p> <p>The experiments used a tiny stage, complete with tiny curtain, and two rabbit puppets. One puppet offered the baby a plate with one cracker on it, while the other puppet offered either two or eight crackers. As for the older kids, the babies reliably choose the plate with more crackers.</p> <p>But then the experimenters started a little morality play. The babies looked on as a lamb puppet on the stage tried and failed to open a clear box to get a toy. Then, one of the rabbit puppets would either help the lamb open the box and get the toy, or slam the box shut, after which the lamb puppet would dive face down next to the closed box in despair. Then, infants were offered the crackers again.</p> <p>When choosing between one cracker from a good puppet or two crackers from a bad puppet, the infants robustly went with the do-gooder, the researchers say. But again, the results were somewhat different when the bad puppet offered a much bigger reward. When the bad puppet offered eight crackers, infants tended to choose the larger number.</p> <p>It's not clear why kids are more willing to interact with wrongdoers who offer more – whether their self-interest in getting more graham crackers just trumps their moral considerations, or whether they view the crackers as a kind of apology or retribution.</p> <p>But the general results suggest that people are willing to pay personal costs – up to a point – to avoid dealing with immoral or deviant people, the researchers say, and that this behaviour begins very young.</p> <p>Tell us: Have you found your grandbabies know right from wrong? Share your experiences with us in the comments below. </p> <p><em>Written by Ana Swanson. First appeared on <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stuff.co.nz.</span></strong></a></em></p> <p><strong>Related links:</strong></p> <p><a href="/lifestyle/family-pets/2016/05/tips-to-help-shy-grandchildren-to-become-more-confident/"><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">5 ways to help shy grandchildren to become more confident</span></em></strong></a></p> <p><a href="/lifestyle/family-pets/2016/05/science-backed-ways-to-get-children-to-love-fruit-and-veg/"><em><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">9 science-backed ways to get children to love fruit and veg</span></strong></em></a></p> <p><a href="/lifestyle/family-pets/2016/05/best-childrens-books-to-read-to-grandkids/"><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The best children’s books to buy for your grandkids</span></em></strong></a></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Duchess Kate says “George is too naughty to bring to India”

<p>Like any other parent would, Kate is missing her children dearly aPrince William and the Duchess tour India and its neighbouring countries. <em>Woman’s Weekly</em> reports that village elders asked why the royal couple hadn't brought their children, Kate replied: "Because George is too naughty. He would be running all over the place. The next time we come we will definitely bring them." </p> <p>It’s the first time the Duchess, 34, has been apart from her children for a prolonged period and her and William have been spending much of their time meeting India's youngsters.</p> <p>The couple was warmly welcomed by Panbari Village and visited a typical home and tea plantation nearby. At the house, which featured mud-daubed walls, they were greeted reverentially by Tilasha Das, 30, and his wife Utala, 25 who knelt down and touched the couple's feet before they entered the premises.</p> <p>Along with their daughters Anamika, eight, and Kumkum, five, and surrounded by extended family, neighbours and a pet black baby goat, they chatted to the Royal couple about life in the village and selling "char" at the local market.</p> <p>The Duchess was praised by local man Morami Das’s, who said “I love her. I think she's very, very pretty. She acts like a simple girl, not a princess.”</p> <p><strong>Related links:</strong></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.oversixty.co.nz/news/news/2016/04/kate-is-missing-george-and-charlotte/"><em>Duchess of Cambridge is already missing George and Charlotte</em></a></strong></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.oversixty.co.nz/news/news/2016/04/prince-william-and-duchess-kate-arrive-in-india-for-week-long-tour/"><em>Prince William and Duchess Kate arrive in India for week-long tour</em></a></strong></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.oversixty.co.nz/news/news/2016/03/kate-middleton-shares-thoughts-on-queen-in-new-interview/"><em>Kate Middleton reveals her thoughts and personal anecdotes about Her Majesty</em></a></strong></span></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Artist shares “naughty” images from babysitting day

<p>Photographer and artist, Fern Smooch, recently babysat his friend’s kids under one condition: She got to bring her camera.</p> <p>“My friend told me that since they had kids they don’t have any time to even go to the movies or do anything anymore, so here I come to save the day!” said the photographer.</p> <p>“Babysitting 101: don’t hire a friend that holds a camera.”</p> <p>The result was some hilariously “naughty” photos. And don’t worry, although the photos look dangerous, the kids were never at any risk. Fern took multiple photos and Photoshopped them together. He also held the children during the dangerous-looking shots, using a tripod and timer to capture the photos, and then Photoshopping himself out of the pictures.</p> <p><img width="541" height="360" src="http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/i-agreed-to-babysit-my-friends-babies-for-a-day-under-one-condition-i-get-to-bring-a-camera__880.jpg"/></p> <p><img width="541" height="360" src="http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/i-agreed-to-babysit-my-friends-babies-for-a-day-under-one-condition-i-get-to-bring-a-camera-3__880.jpg"/></p> <p><img width="539" height="340" src="http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/i-agreed-to-babysit-my-friends-babies-for-a-day-under-one-condition-i-get-to-bring-a-camera-4__880.jpg"/></p> <p><img width="539" height="359" src="http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/i-agreed-to-babysit-my-friends-babies-for-a-day-under-one-condition-i-get-to-bring-a-camera-5__880.jpg"/></p> <p> </p>

Family & Pets